Patagonian Toothfish, *Dissostichus* *eleginoides* Smitt, 1898.

Patagonian Toothfish, Dissostichus eleginoides Smitt, 1898.



Map of the management areas within the CAMLR Convention Area. The region discussed in this report is shaded in green. Throughout this report, “2024” refers to the 2023/24 CCAMLR fishing season (from 1 December 2023 to 30 November 2024). Coastlines and ice shelves: UK Polar Data Centre/BAS and Natural Earth. Projection: EPSG 6932.

Map of the management areas within the CAMLR Convention Area. The region discussed in this report is shaded in green. Throughout this report, “2024” refers to the 2023/24 CCAMLR fishing season (from 1 December 2023 to 30 November 2024). Coastlines and ice shelves: UK Polar Data Centre/BAS and Natural Earth. Projection: EPSG 6932.



1. Introduction to the fishery

1.1. History

This report describes the licensed longline fishery for Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) in the South African Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) at the Prince Edward Islands. Within the CAMLR Convention Area, this EEZ is mostly situated within the boundaries of Subarea 58.7 and overlaps a small portion of Division 58.4.4a and also extends into FAO Area 51 outside the Convention Area. Fishing outside areas of national jurisdiction in either Subarea 58.7 or Division 58.4.4a is currently prohibited.

Reports of substantial illegal fishing prompted South Africa to establish a legal fishery in its EEZ in 1996 and five experimental permits, with a total catch limit of 2,500 tonnes, were issued for 1997.

Some experimental pot fishing was undertaken during 2004 and 2005, but historically, most of the catch was taken with autoline and Spanish longline. In 2008, trotlines were introduced in response to high levels of catch depredation by killer whales (Orcinus orca) and by 2011 these had largely replaced Spanish longlines.


1.2. Conservation Measures currently in force

Within the South African EEZ, catch limits for target and by-catch species, as well as vessel licensing, are assigned by South Africa. In 2005, South Africa licensed five operators with fixed proportional allocations and a catch limit of 450 tonnes, to undertake fishing in its EEZ at the Prince Edward Islands. Between 2006 and 2010, only one operator, holding 27% of the catch limit, had been active in the fishery but in 2010, a second vessel licensed to catch the remaining 73%, entered the fishery.

Figure 1: Map of the region discussed in this report. Coastlines and ice shelves: UK Polar Data Centre/BAS and Natural Earth. Bathymetry: GEBCO. Projection: EPSG 6932 (rotated).

Figure 1: Map of the region discussed in this report. Coastlines and ice shelves: UK Polar Data Centre/BAS and Natural Earth. Bathymetry: GEBCO. Projection: EPSG 6932 (rotated).


1.3. Active vessels

In 2024, 2 vessel participated in this fishery.


2. Reported catch

2.1. Latest reports and limits

Reported catches of Dissostichus eleginoides are presented in Table 1. In this fishery, the catch of D. eleginoides reached a maximum of 1351 tonnes in 1997. In 2024, 236 tonnes of D. eleginoides were caught.

No targeted fishing activity is permitted within the Division 58.4.4a sector of the South African EEZ.


Table 1. Catch (tonnes) and effort history for Dissostichus eleginoides in this fishery. Source: Fine scale data and past estimates for IUU catch (-: no fishing, or no IUU estimate available).
Season Number of vessels Catch Estimated IUU catch (tonnes)
1996 5 799
1997 10 1351
1998 4 838
1999 2 96
2000 4 315
2001 3 55
2002 2 75
2003
2004 2 97
2005 1 97
2006 1 149 0
2007 2 189 0
2008 1 122 0
2009 2 45 0
2010 2 150 0
2011 2 122 0
2012 2 251 0
2013 2 180 0
2014 2 276 0
2015 2 310 0
2016 2 230
2017 2 67
2018 2 307
2019 2 266
2020 2 269
2021 2 365
2022 2 69
2023 1 261
2024 2 236


2.2. By-catch

Catch limits for by-catch species groups (Macrourus spp., skates and rays, and other species) are set by South Africa. The recent catch histories for by-catch species are provided in Table 2.

The by-catch in the South African EEZ consists predominantly of Macrourus spp. (Table 2), the majority of which are caught in the Subarea 58.7 sector of the EEZ.


Table 2. Reported catch for by-catch species (Macrourus spp., skates and rays, and other species) in this fishery. Source: fine-scale data.
Macrourus spp.
Skates and rays
Other catch
Season Reported Catch (tonnes) Reported Catch (tonnes) Number Released Reported Catch (tonnes)
1996 0 0 0 0
1997 <1 0 0 <1
1998 0 <1 0 <1
1999 0 0 0 0
2000 58 5 0 15
2001 15 <1 0 1
2002 4 0 0 <1
2004 <1 0 0 0
2006 10 0 0 <1
2007 31 <1 0 4
2008 8 0 0 5
2009 3 <1 327 <1
2010 5 <1 283 1
2011 5 <1 255 2
2012 15 <1 4 1
2013 20 <1 0 2
2014 19 <1 0 5
2015 20 <1 0 6
2016 12 <1 12 3
2017 7 <1 0 2
2018 20 3 13 6
2019 6 7 240 4
2020 11 14 0 6
2021 15 3 1352 5
2022 9 <1 155 1
2023 41 2 857 7
2024 27 2 260 3


2.3. Vulnerable marine ecosystems (VMEs)

As Conservation Measure 22-06 does not apply to this Subarea there are no CCAMLR VMEs or VME Risk Areas designated in Subarea 58.7.


2.4. Incidental mortality of seabirds and marine mammals

The level of risk of incidental mortality of birds in the fishery in the South African EEZ at the Prince Edward Islands is considered to be high (category 5) (SC-CAMLR-XXX, Annex 8, paragraph 8.1).

The requirements of Conservation Measure 25-02 ‘Minimisation of the incidental mortality of seabirds in the course of longline fishing or longline fishing research in the Convention Area’ apply to this fishery. There is an exemption to the requirement for night setting by achieving the sink rates described in Conservation Measure 24-02 and subject to a bird by-catch limit. South Africa has applied the mitigation measures recommended by CCAMLR within its EEZ, with the exception of a seasonal closure.

The three most common species injured or killed in the fishery were Southern giant petrel (Macronectes giganteus), Northern giant petrel (Macronectes halli) and white-chinned petrel (Procellaria aequinoctialis) (Table 3).

Table 3. Number of reported birds caught (killed or with injuries likely to substantially reduce long-term survival) in this fishery in each fishing season.
Season Macronectes giganteus Macronectes halli Procellaria aequinoctialis Other
1996 3 1 131 20
1997 21 8 480 260
1998 11 459 7
2000 1
2001 13
2004 11 5 3


Depredation of the catch, particularly by toothed cetaceans, can contribute up to 50% of loss in catch landings in this fishery.

There have been no reports of incidental mortalities of mammals since 2000 in this fishery.

3. Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) fishing

Although the illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing in the South African EEZ at the Prince Edward Islands was first detected in 1995, the illegal exploitation of D. eleginoides is thought to have started in 1994 and continued until at least 2005.

An analysis presented by Brandão et al. (2002) estimated that the IUU catch of D. eleginoides for the South African EEZ in 1996 and 1997 was 21,350 tonnes, which is more than the total legal catch taken over the history of the fishery, including all IUU catch subsequent to 1997.

There have been no official reports of IUU fishing in the South African EEZ since 2006 and, following the recognition of methodological issues in its assessment, no estimates of the IUU catch of Dissostichus spp. have been provided since 2011 (SC-CAMLR-XXIX, paragraph 6.5). However, the recovery of IUU fishing gear and unconfirmed reports of IUU vessels in Subarea 58.6 and Division 58.4.4 indicate that undetected IUU activity may continue to occur in this area.


4. Data collection

4.1. Data collection requirements

The collection of biological data as part of the CCAMLR Scheme of International Scientific Observation (SISO) includes representative samples of length, weight, sex and maturity stage, as well as collection of otoliths for age determination of the target and most frequently taken by-catch species.


4.2. Summary of available data

Both the vessel’s crew and observers collect fishing effort, catch, and by-catch information.

The vessel’s crew report total catch of non-VME by-catch (mostly fishes) by coarse taxonomic groups given the taxonomic expertise required to discriminate similar species. Observers collect biological information on toothfish and by-catch specimens at a finer taxonomic resolution, as well as data on individual specimens such as size and maturity.

Although Conservation Measures 22-06 and 22-07 do not apply to this fishery, crew and observers may occasionally follow the sampling protocols outlined in Conservation Measure 22-07. To do so, lines are observed in segments (1000-hook sections or 1200m sections, whichever is the shorter) and the number of VME indicator units is reported (either one litre of those VME indicator organisms that can be placed in a 10-litre container, or one kilogram of those VME indicator organisms that do not fit into a 10-litre container). Based on the portion of the line monitored, observers further identify VME indicator organisms to the lowest taxonomic level possible.

Summaries of data reported to CCAMLR for the past five years are given in Tables 4 and 5.

Table 4. Summary of by-catch and biological data reported by vessels crew and observers in each of the last five seasons. By-catch records correspond to the number of observations of total weight and count of individuals for each taxon identified. Observers may take further biological measurements on toothfish and by-catch taxa. Taxonomic identification may occur at different levels.
Data source Data class Variable 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Vessel crew VME line segments 512 1556 135 0 459
VME indicator units > 5 and < 10 0 0 0 0 0
VME indicator units > 10 0 0 0 0 0
by-catch taxa identified 3 4 4 15 11
records 701 886 225 766 396
Observer VME line segments 193 1002 318 746 872
taxa identified 4 11 9 15 18
weight or volume measurements 13 50 33 160 250
toothfish specimens examined 8482 14282 3864 7826 7468
length measurements 8482 14280 3864 7826 7467
weight measurements 8480 14277 3864 7823 7464
sex identifications 8480 14275 3863 7809 7468
maturity stage identifications 8464 14273 3858 7787 7420
gonad weight measurements 8424 8487 2572 3971 5192
otolith samples 1800 4134 1236 3056 1780
by-catch specimens examined 2477 4771 1578 4225 2728
taxa identified 8 11 8 19 11
length measurements 891 2664 841 4205 2728
weight measurements** 2472 4730 1576 4203 2712
standard length measurements* 0 30 2 471 5
wingspan measurements* 1 13 4 153 71
pelvic length measurements* 1 10 4 146 71
snout to anus measurements* 1581 3262 1234 3287 2391
sex identifications** 799 1193 4 872 2114
maturity stage identifications** 1 1172 3 877 2096
gonad weight measurements** 1 0 0 1 4
otolith samples** 0 1 1 2 2
**: Voluntary records
*: Species-dependent records
Table 5. Summary of biological data for predominant by-catch groups reported by observers (from random subsets of lines) in each of the last five seasons. Taxonomic identification may occur at different levels.
By-catch group Variable 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Macrourus spp. specimens examined 1585 3257 1235 3333 2410
taxa identified 2 1 1 3 3
length measurements 0 1168 499 3319 2410
weight measurements** 1581 3227 1233 3313 2397
snout to anus measurements* 1581 3249 1234 3278 2391
sex identifications** 594 736 0 549 1902
maturity stage identifications** 0 729 0 548 1889
gonad weight measurements** 0 0 0 0 4
otolith samples** 0 0 0 1 1
Skates and rays specimens examined 1 10 4 154 71
taxa identified 1 1 2 3 3
length measurements 1 10 4 152 71
weight measurements** 1 10 4 154 71
wingspan measurements* 1 10 4 153 71
pelvic length measurements* 1 10 4 146 71
sex identifications** 1 10 3 144 71
maturity stage identifications** 0 10 3 152 67
gonad weight measurements** 0 0 0 0 0
Other fish specimens examined 891 1504 339 734 244
taxa identified 5 9 5 10 4
length measurements 890 1486 338 734 244
weight measurements** 890 1493 339 732 241
standard length measurements* 0 10 2 471 5
sex identifications** 204 447 1 177 141
maturity stage identifications** 1 433 0 175 140
gonad weight measurements** 1 0 0 1 0
otolith samples** 0 1 1 1 0
**: Voluntary records
*: Species-dependent records


The counts of by-catch taxa reported above (Table 5) correspond to specimens that have been individually sampled by observers. These are a subset of all the specimens counted by observers and are generally identified at a more precise taxonomic level. The figures below (Figs. 2 and 3) display the distribution of the most frequently examined by-catch taxa in time and space. It is important to note that observers sample a random subset of lines and do not individually examine all taxa; as such these figures are more representative of the distribution of biological observations than the catch of these taxa or their spatial distribution. At a coarse taxonomic level, the total catch of by-catch species groups is provided in section 2.2 above.

Figure 2. Relative frequencies of the most commonly examined by-catch taxa in each of the last five seasons, from the observer data (unweighted raw counts of individually examined specimens). Taxonomic identification may occur at different levels.

Figure 2. Relative frequencies of the most commonly examined by-catch taxa in each of the last five seasons, from the observer data (unweighted raw counts of individually examined specimens). Taxonomic identification may occur at different levels.


Figure 3. Spatial distribution of the most commonly examined by-catch taxa across the last five seasons, from the observer data (unweighted raw counts of individually examined specimens in each cell). The data were aggregated using equal area (100 km x 100 km) cells. Taxonomic identification may occur at different levels. Refer to Figure 1 for more details on the boundaries shown. Coastlines and ice shelves: UK Polar Data Centre/BAS and Natural Earth. Bathymetry: GEBCO. Projection: EPSG 6932 (rotated).

Figure 3. Spatial distribution of the most commonly examined by-catch taxa across the last five seasons, from the observer data (unweighted raw counts of individually examined specimens in each cell). The data were aggregated using equal area (100 km x 100 km) cells. Taxonomic identification may occur at different levels. Refer to Figure 1 for more details on the boundaries shown. Coastlines and ice shelves: UK Polar Data Centre/BAS and Natural Earth. Bathymetry: GEBCO. Projection: EPSG 6932 (rotated).


4.3. Length frequency distributions

The recent length frequency distributions of D. eleginoides caught in this fishery are shown in Figure 4. The majority of D. eleginoides caught by longline range from 50 to 150cm in length, with a broad mode for all seasons at approximately 75cm. These length frequency distributions are unweighted; they have not been adjusted for factors such as the size of the catches from which they were collected. The interannual variability exhibited in the figure may reflect changes in the fished population but is also likely to reflect changes in the gear used, the number of vessels in the fishery and the spatial and temporal distributions of fishing.


Figure 4. Annual length frequency distributions of *D.* *eleginoides* caught by longline in this fishery. The number of hauls from which fish were measured (N) and the number of fish measured (n) in each year are indicated. Note: length frequency distributions are only shown where more than 150 fish were measured.

Figure 4. Annual length frequency distributions of D. eleginoides caught by longline in this fishery. The number of hauls from which fish were measured (N) and the number of fish measured (n) in each year are indicated. Note: length frequency distributions are only shown where more than 150 fish were measured.


4.3. Tagging

To date in this area, 3945 D. eleginoides have been tagged and released (266 have been recaptured, 224 of which were released in this area; Table 6).

Table 6. Number of Dissostichus eleginoides tagged and recaptured in the area for each fishing Season.
Recaptured
Season Tagged 2009 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
2006 148 1 1 2
2007 98 1 1 2
2008 115 3 3 1 2 2 1 12
2009 38 1 1
2010 183 3 4 2 3 1 4 1 18
2011 124 2 1 2 3 2 1 1 12
2012 279 3 3 2 1 2 11
2013 155 5 5 3 2 1 1 17
2014 291 3 13 10 4 7 1 2 1 1 1 43
2015 313 4 6 5 8 5 3 1 1 33
2016 240 1 1 4 3 1 2 12
2017 63 4 4
2018 326 2 7 5 3 2 1 20
2019 285 4 4 1 9
2020 300 9 4 1 14
2021 409 2 1 5 8
2022 69 1 1 1 3
2023 262 1 2 3
2024 247
Total 3945 224

Only a single tagged fish has been recorded to have moved between the French and South African EEZs and the current management approaches used by France and South Africa do not specifically consider the possibility that these island groups share the same toothfish stock.

5. Research

In 2019, catch removals due to killer and sperm whale interactions across subantarctic fisheries were estimated (WG-FSA-2019/33).

In 2024, a summary of VME indicator taxa by-catch using data from 2009-2023 was presented in WG-FSA-IMAF-2024/45. Further, WG-FSA-IMAF-2024/37 summarised by-catch data from 1996-2003, indicating that no trends were apparent and that M. holotrachys females dominated the observed by-catch.

6. Stock status

6.1. Summary of current status

As this fishery is under South African jurisdiction, more details may be found here.


6.2. Assessment method

The status of D. eleginoides within the South African EEZ was first assessed in 2002 using an age-structured production model (ASPM) and was last reviewed by the Working Group on Fish Stock Assessment (WG-FSA) in 2007 (see SC-CAMLR-XXVI, Annex 5, Appendix N).

However, differences between the reported catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) and catch-at-length data resulted in uncertainty in the assessment outputs. Thus, an operational management procedure (OMP) approach to address this uncertainty was developed in 2009 (SC-CAMLR-XXVII, Annex 7, paragraphs 6.1 to 6.3).

The OMP was not formally adopted by South Africa as a basis for management as only one of the five right holders (licensed to catch 27% of the catch limit) was active in the fishery between 2006 and 2010 and the catch limit was kept at 450 tonnes per annum from 2005 to 2010.

A revision of the OMP was attempted in 2011 but was hampered by the fact that the preferred gear type had shifted between 2008 and 2011 from Spanish longline to trotline gear. In order to standardise the catch rates (CPUE) between gear types, a two-year experiment using a general linear mixed model (GLMM), was initiated in 2012 and a precautionary catch limit of 320 tonnes per annum was set:

  1. a research allocation of 68.8% of the annual catch limit (220 tonnes per annum) was set aside for collection of catch data from Spanish longline/trotline pairs in 2012 and 2013 with a target of 100 Spanish/trot pairs per year

  2. for each Spanish longline set, a trotline must be set within 3 nautical miles and within a period of one week either before or after the Spanish longline set

  3. to compensate for the expected loss of revenue associated with setting Spanish longline gear, vessels were eligible to hold the catch from two further trotline sets against the research allocation.


6.3. Year of last assessment, year of next assessment

As this fishery is under South African jurisdiction, more details may be found here.


7. Climate Change and environmental variability

In 2022, the Commission recognised that climate change is already having effects in the Convention Area (CCAMLR-41, paragraph 6.3) and agreed that it needed to act urgently to prepare for, and adapt to, the effects of climate change on the marine ecosystems within the Convention Area (CCAMLR-41, paragraph 6.5). The Commission noted (CCAMLR-41, paragraph 6.4) that the Scientific Committee had incorporated climate change into its advice (SC-CAMLR-41, paragraph 7.8) and through discussions at the SC-Symposium (SC-CAMLR-41, Annex 11) had also added climate change to the work plans and terms of reference of its Working Groups (SC-CAMLR-41, paragraph 7.14). The Commission adopted (CCAMLR-41, paragraph 6.28) Resolution 36/41.

In 2023, the Scientific Committee held a workshop on Climate Change (WS-CC-2023) which made recommendations regarding monitoring and management actions CCAMLR could progress to document and track the effects of climate change in the Convention Area. The recommendations were incorporated into the workplan of the Scientific Committee. Further, the Scientific Committee recommended that summaries of evidence for changes in stock assessment parameters or processes that could be due to the effects of environmental variability or climate change be developed for all fisheries (SC-CAMLR-42, paragraph 2.149).

In 2024, Members developed such summaries, in the form of tables, for fisheries in Subarea 48.3, Divisions 58.5.1 and 58.5.2 and in the Ross Sea region.


Additional Resources

References

Brandão, A., D.S. Butterworth, B.P. Watkins and D.G.M. Miller. 2002. A first attempt at an assessment of the Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) resource in the Prince Edward Islands EEZ. CCAMLR Science, 9: 11-32.