Antarctic Toothfish, *Dissostichus* *mawsoni* Norman, 1937.

Antarctic Toothfish, Dissostichus mawsoni Norman, 1937.



Map of the management areas within the CAMLR Convention Area. Subarea 88.1, SSRUs 882A and 882B, the regions discussed in this report are shaded in green. Throughout this report, “2024” refers to the 2023/24 CCAMLR fishing season (from 1 December 2023 to 30 November 2024). Coastlines and ice shelves: UK Polar Data Centre/BAS and Natural Earth. Projection: EPSG 6932.

Map of the management areas within the CAMLR Convention Area. Subarea 88.1, SSRUs 882A and 882B, the regions discussed in this report are shaded in green. Throughout this report, “2024” refers to the 2023/24 CCAMLR fishing season (from 1 December 2023 to 30 November 2024). Coastlines and ice shelves: UK Polar Data Centre/BAS and Natural Earth. Projection: EPSG 6932.



1. Introduction to the fishery

1.1. History

This report describes the exploratory longline fishery for Antarctic toothfish (Dissostichus mawsoni) in Subarea 88.1 and Small-Scale Research Units 882A and 882B (Fig. 1). The area spans 150\(^{\circ}\)E to 150\(^{\circ}\)W longitude and from the Antarctic Continent to 60\(^{\circ}\)S latitude. Fishing occurs around seamounts and ridges of the Pacific-Antarctic fracture zone, the continental slope, and the continental shelf areas. The Ross Sea region Marine Protected Area (RSrMPA) was implemented through Conservation Measure 91-05 in 2017, closing much of the continental shelf to commercial fishing.

The fishery began in 1997 and slowly grew in number of vessels and catch until 2003. The Small-Scale Research Units (SSRU) definitions were changed in 2006 when several were closed to concentrate fishing in the central Ross Sea region (SC-CAMLR-XXIV, paragraphs 4.163 to 4.166). SSRU 881M was defined and closed in 2009 to protect the likely toothfish migration corridor in the western Ross Sea (SC-CAMLR-XXVII, paragraphs 4.160 and 4.161).

Prior to 2017, this fishery was an exploratory fishery for Dissostichus spp., however, in order to better align the target species with the assessment process, the target species was specified as D. mawsoni, with any Patagonian toothfish (D. eleginoides) caught counting towards the catch limit for D. mawsoni.

Catches of D. eleginoides have mainly come from the northwest of the region in SSRUs 881A-C (WG-FSA-13/48). Catches were quite high in the early part of the fishery, particularly in 2001, but have been relatively low since then as fishing occurred in more easterly areas. The catch rates for D. eleginoides have been much higher in SSRU 881A than the other SSRUs; this SSRU was closed to fishing from 2008 to 2017, and reopened in 2018 as part of the N70 (north of 70\(^{\circ}\)S) management area.

The only type of fishing gear allowed in the fishery is bottom longline. Three types of bottom longline gear are used, Autoline, Spanish Line, and Trotline (See the CCAMLR Gear Library for details). Although toothfish do inhabit shallow water to some degree, they are mainly a deep-water species and the fishery is restricted to fishing deeper than 550m (Conservation Measure 22-08). Most fishing occurs at depths between 800m and 1800m.

The length of the fishing season in this fishery has changed over time. In the first few years, the fishery was mainly carried out from January to March, and between 2001 and 2003 extended into April and May. Each year since 2005, the fishery has been closed through attaining the allocated catch limit. The duration of the fishery has been decreasing in recent years, typically lasting only 6-9 weeks.

Sea ice is a major constraint on the timing and location of fishing within open areas of this fishery. Significant sea ice can prevent access by vessels to many areas, especially early in the fishing season. Typically, a large sea ice bridge must be navigated through to reach the main fishing area on the continental slope.

CCAMLR established the RSrMPA in 2017, the largest high seas Marine Protected Area (MPA) in the world to date. The MPA has a lifetime of 35 years. It can be renewed subject to a final review in 2052. The MPA has multiple objectives including providing a reference area to better understand the ecosystem effects of climate change and fishing, preserving a representative portion of the Ross Sea environment (including benthic and pelagic marine environments), and, protecting core foraging areas for land-based predators. A Scientific Research and Monitoring Plan has been developed for this MPA. A dedicated Conservation Measure defining the Ross Sea MPA is due for review at least every 10 years to evaluate whether the specific objectives of the MPA are still relevant and are being achieved.


1.2. Conservation Measures currently in force

The catch limits and regulation of by-catch for this fishery are defined in Conservation Measure 41-09 with additional requirements outlined in 91-05.

Figure 1: Location of Small Scale Research Units, Areas of directed fishing and Marine Protected Areas in this fishery. Coastlines and ice shelves: UK Polar Data Centre/BAS and Natural Earth. Bathymetry: GEBCO. Projection: EPSG 6932 (rotated).

Figure 1: Location of Small Scale Research Units, Areas of directed fishing and Marine Protected Areas in this fishery. Coastlines and ice shelves: UK Polar Data Centre/BAS and Natural Earth. Bathymetry: GEBCO. Projection: EPSG 6932 (rotated).


1.3. Active vessels

In 2024, 23 vessels participated in this fishery. For the 2025 fishing season, a total of 27 vessels notified their intention to participate in this fishery (2 from Australia; 1 from Chile; 2 from France; 1 from Japan; 1 from Namibia; 3 from New Zealand; 1 from Spain; 4 from Ukraine; 7 from the Republic of Korea; 2 from the Russian Federation; 3 from the United Kingdom).


1.4. Timeline of spatial management

The limits on the exploratory fishery for D. mawsoni in this area are described in Conservation Measure 41-09.

From 2006 through 2016, the distribution of catch limits to the Small-Scale Research Units (SSRUs) in Subareas 88.1 and 88.2 was part of an experiment with the SSRUs between 150\(^{\circ}\)E and 170\(^{\circ}\)E (881A, D, E, F) and between 170\(^{\circ}\)W and 150\(^{\circ}\)W (882A-B) being closed to fishing to ensure that effort was retained in the area of the experiment (SC-CAMLR-XXIV, paragraphs 4.163 to 4.166). To assist administration of the fishery, the catch limits for SSRUs 881B, C and G were combined into a ‘north’ region (881B, C, G), those for SSRUs 881H, I and K were combined into a ‘slope’ region (881H, I, K) and those for SSRUs 881J and L into a ‘shelf’ region (881J, L). These administrative boundaries were used for the management of the fishery, however, the allocation of catches to these regions in the assessment process uses a tree-based regression based on the median length of fish in each longline set, and the explanatory variables SSRU and depth.

After 1 December 2017, when the Ross Sea region Marine Protected Area (RSrMPA) came into force (Conservation Measure 91-05), the regions to which catch limits apply were modified to all areas outside the RSrMPA and north of 70\(^{\circ}\)S (N70), all areas outside the RSrMPA and south of 70\(^{\circ}\)S (S70), and, the Special Research Zone (SRZ). The MPA comprises General Protection Zones (GPZ) with three separate areas (i, ii, iii), the Special Research Zone (SRZ) and a Krill Research Zone (KRZ) (see Figure 1).


2. Reported catch

2.1. Latest reports and limits

The catches of D. mawsoni and D. eleginoides from this region are provided in Table 1. In this fishery, the catch of D. mawsoni reached a maximum of 3355 tonnes in 2023. In 2024, 1 tonnes of D. eleginoides and 3287 tonnes of D. mawsoni were caught.

The catches reported from this fishery include catch data from particular vessels that CCAMLR has agreed should be quarantined as there is no confidence in the amount and/or the location of those catches (SC-CAMLR-XXXIII, paragraph 3.68). All ancillary data associated with these vessels (e.g., by-catch, tagging, observer data) are also quarantined and not included in the data presented in this report.


Table 1. Catch (tonnes) and effort history for Dissostichus spp. in this fishery (Subarea 88.1 and SSRUs 882A-B). Source: Fine scale data and past estimates for IUU catch (-: no IUU estimate available; q: catch data currently quarantined).
Season Number of vessels Catch limit (tonnes) D. eleginoides D. mawsoni Estimated IUU catch (tonnes)
1997 1 1980 0 0 0
1998 1 1510 1 41 0
1999 2 2281 1 296 0
2000 3 2090 0 752 0
2001 7 2064 31 592 0
2002 2 2508 12 1355 92
2003 9 3760 26 1769 0
2004 21 3250 12 2178 240
2005 10 3250 7 3210 28
2006 13 2964 1 2967 0
2007 15 3032 12 3079 0
2008 15 2700 9 2250 272
2009 13 2700 17 2432 0
2010 12 2850 0 2868 0
2011 15 2850 3 2803 (q: 44)
2012 15 3282 5 3209
2013 18 3282 0 3030 (q: 156)
2014 20 3044 4 2221 (q: 700)
2015 14 2844 1 2360 (q: 473)
2016 13 2870 5 2484 (q: 194)
2017 16 2870 1 2771 (q: 50)
2018 17 3157 1 2637 (q: 188)
2019 19 3157 1 3046
2020 19 3140 0 2972
2021 17 3140 10 3135
2022 19 3495 14 3274
2023 17 3495 7 3355
2024 23 3499 1 3287


2.2. By-catch

Catch limits for by-catch species groups (Macrourus spp., skates and rays, and other species) are defined in Conservation Measure 41-09; these are also provided in Table 2.

If the by-catch of any one species is equal to, or greater than, 1 tonne in any one haul or set, then the fishing vessel must move at least 5 nautical miles away for a period of at least five days.

If the catch of Macrourus spp. taken by a single vessel in any two 10-day periods in a single SSRU exceeds 1,500kg in a 10-day period and exceeds 16% of the catch of D. mawsoni in that period, the vessel shall cease fishing in that management area (SSRU or group of SSRUs) for the remainder of the season.

Skates evaluated to have a good chance of survival (based on a skate condition guide) are released at the surface in accordance with Conservation Measure 41-09.


Table 2. Reported catch and catch limits for by-catch species (Macrourus spp., skates and rays, and others) in this fishery (Subarea 88.1 and SSRUs 882A-B). see CM 41-09 for details. Source: fine-scale data. q: Some data in these years is currently quarantined.
Macrourus spp.
Skates and rays
Other catch
Season Catch Limit (tonnes) Reported Catch (tonnes) Catch Limit (tonnes) Reported Catch (tonnes) Number Released Catch Limit (tonnes) Reported Catch (tonnes)
1997 0 0 0 <1
1998 9 5 0 <1
1999 22 39 0 5
2000 70 41 0 7
2001 61 9 0 14
2002 158 25 0 10
2003 65 11 966 12
2004 520 319 163 23 1852 180 23
2005 520 462 163 69 5057 180 24
2006 474 266 148 5 14698 160 18
2007 485 153 152 38 7336 160 43
2008 426 112 133 4 7190 160 20
2009 430 183 135 7 7088 160 16
2010 430 119 142 8 6796 160 15
2011 430 190 q 142 4 5440 160 8
2012 430 143 164 1 2238 160 4
2013 430 125 q 164 4 q 5675 q 160 9 q
2014 430 127 q 152 2 q 5534 q 160 16 q
2015 430 87 q 152 5 q 12978 q 160 24 q
2016 430 87 q 152 7 q 6016 q 160 22 q
2017 430 66 143 4 3857 160 12 q
2018 485 78 q 157 8 5924 157 14 q
2019 485 147 157 9 8870 157 26
2020 485 117 157 15 15620 157 33
2021 485 125 157 10 9490 157 33
2022 494 229 170 7 15654 170 52
2023 494 139 169 27 8461 169 23
2024 494 156 170 12 20147 170 43

In 2008, biomass and yield estimates of Macrourus spp. for this fishery were based on extrapolations under three different density assumptions from a trawl survey (WG-FSA-08/32). The resulting biomass estimate was 21,401 tonnes with an estimated CV of 0.5 for the slope area, which gave a yield estimate of 388 tonnes in that region. This yield estimate was then apportioned to SSRUs taking into account the spatial distribution of maximum historical catches. The catch limit on the Shelf was set at slightly higher than the maximum catches (70 t) with the remaining yield on the Slope (320 t); and the catch limit in the North was set at a nominal 40 t (SC-CAMLR-XXXVII, Appendix 3 paragraphs 6.16-6.22). By-catch limits for macrourids, skates and other species were adapted to the RSrMPA management areas for the 2018 fishing year resulting in small changes to each catch limit (SC-CAMLR-XXXVI Paragraph 3.149, Annex 7 Table 8).

In 2011, it was recognised that specimens originally identified in the region as Whitson’s grenadier (Macrourus whitsoni) did in fact comprise two sympatric species: M. whitsoni and M. caml (McMillan et al., 2012). Macrourus caml grows larger than M. whitsoni and is about 20% heavier for a given length (Pinkerton et al., 2013). The two species can be distinguished morphologically through the number of pelvic fin rays and the number of rows of teeth in the lower jaw. The distribution of M. whitsoni and M. caml seems to almost completely overlap by depth and area, with both appearing to be abundant in depths between 900 and 1,900m. Initial data suggest that catches of females of both species exceed that of males (especially for M. caml) and this sex selectivity cannot be explained by size or age of fish (Pinkerton et al., 2013). Previous work which was presumed to have been carried out on M. whitsoni would actually have been carried out on a mix of the two species. Otolith aging data show that the two species have very different growth rates (Pinkerton et al., 2013). Macrourus whitsoni approaches adult size at about 10-15 years of age and can live to at least 27 years, whereas M. caml reaches adult size at about 15-20 years and can live in excess of 60 years. Sexual maturity in female M. whitsoni is reached at 52cm and 16 years, but in female M. caml at 46cm and 13 years. Gonad staging data imply that the spawning period of both species is protracted, extending from before December to after February.

In 2012, a characterisation of the by-catch (WG-FSA-12/42) showed that the three most frequently recorded ‘other’ by-catch species were icefish (mainly Chionobathyscus dewitti), eel cods (mainly Muraenolepis evseenkoi) and morid cods (mainly Antimora rostrata). The total catch for each of these species groups from 1998 to 2012 was 100, 102 and 97 tonnes respectively, and each formed about 0.3% of the total catch by weight.

WG-FSA-10/25 provided a characterisation of skate catches in the region and concluded that aspects of the catch history were very uncertain, including the species composition, the weight and number of skates caught, the proportion discarded and the survival of those fish that were tagged. While the size composition of the commercial catch was uncertain before 2009 because of the low numbers sampled each year, data collected in the Year-of-the-Skate (2009) resulted in improved estimates of the length frequency of the catch. During the Year-of-the-Skate a total of about 3,300 georgian ray (Amblyraja georgiana) and 700 Eaton’s skate (Bathyraja cf. eatonii) were tagged and a total of 179 skates recaptured. Analysis of recaptures from that experiment were presented in WG-FSA-18/38 and a second pulse of tagging to index abundance was agreed for 2020 and 2021 (including marking some skates with either strontium or oxytetracycline for age validation; SC-CAMLR-38 paragraph 5.5).

In 2021, a summary of available by-catch data in the region indicated that, as found in other areas of the Convention, macrourids were the most commonly observed by-catch group by both weight and numbers. Macrourids, skates, icefish, eel cods and morid cods comprised almost 99.5% of the total by-catch by weight WG-FSA-2021/32. Also, WG-FSA-2021/33 provided an update on a 2-year skate tagging programme, implemented in the 2020 and 2021 fishing seasons, aiming at population size estimation and to validate the thorn ageing method for Antarctic starry skate (Amblyraja georgiana).

In 2022, a study comparing the biology of M. caml and M. whitsoni reported that the former lived longer, grew slower, attained a larger maximum length than the latter, and, that for both species, females of a given age were larger and reached a greater maximum age than males (WG-FSA-2022/P04). WG-FSA-2022/42 and WG-FSA-2022/43 provided updates on the skate tagging programme where 2408 Antarctic starry skates (Amblyraja georgiana) were injected with a cartilage-marking chemical, 27 of which were recaptured and will enable validating age determination using caudal thorns. WG-FSA-2022/48 updated an analysis using the VAST (Vector Autoregressive Spatio-Temporal) modelling approach to predict spatio-temporal changes in macrourid by-catch in this fishery, and confirmed that it was appropriate to employ the results of the VAST models for M. whitsoni and M. caml to set by-catch limits for Macrourus spp. in this fishery. WG-FSA-2022/47 provided a summary of trends in performance indicators, including catches, fishing effort, catch rates, fish size, sex ratios and fish body condition, for the main by-catch species/species groups in this fishery.

In 2023, New Zealand reported on three bottom trawl surveys carried out in the Ross Sea region in SSRUs 881HIK and 882A in 2008, 2015, and 2019 which were combined across years and scaled to the slope area to give a composite biomass estimate (WG-FSA-2023/27). While recommending additional work, the by-catch limits for macrourids remained unchanged (WG-FSA-2023 paragraph 5.22). A review of the performance of the macrourid move-on rule (WG-FSA-2023, paragraphs 5.23–5.26) resulted in maintaining the move on rule application in the Ross Sea fishery to the SSRU level (SC-CAMLR-42, paragraph 3.2). New information was provided on identification of macrourid species using molecular tools (WG-FSA-2023/32), with improvements to identification guides (WG-FSA-2023, paragraphs 5.30–5.32). Biomass and exploitation rates for skates were updated for the Ross Sea region (WG-FSA-2023/50) and results from the 2020 and 2021 tagging program in the Ross Sea were reviewed (WG-FSA-2023/65 Rev. 1).

2.3. Vulnerable marine ecosystems (VMEs)

All Members are required to submit, within their general new (Conservation Measure 21-01) and exploratory (Conservation Measure 21-02) fisheries notifications requirements, information on the known and anticipated impacts of their gear on vulnerable marine ecosystems (VMEs, as shown in the CCAMLR VME taxa classification guide), including benthic communities and benthos such as seamounts, hydrothermal vents and cold-water corals. All of the VMEs in CCAMLR’s VME Registry are currently afforded protection through specific area closures. The CCAMLR VME guide was updated in WG-FSA-2023/70 and made available for use in the Ross Sea for the 2023 season (WG-FSA-2023, paragraph 5.59).

By the end of this fishing season, there were 9 VMEs and 61 VME Risk Areas designated in the Ross Sea Region.


2.4. Incidental mortality of seabirds and marine mammals

Only one seabird mortality has ever been reported by vessels in this toothfish fishery: a Southern giant petrel (Macronectes giganteus) in 2014. Considerable effort has been put into the mitigation of seabird captures in CCAMLR fisheries, through implementation of Conservation Measures regarding line sink rate, use of streamer lines, seasonal restrictions on fishing, prohibition of offal dumping, line weighting and only allowing daytime setting under strict conditions.

The risk levels of interactions with birds in the fishery in Subarea 88.1 is category 1 (low) south of 65\(^{\circ}\)S, category 3 (average) north of 65\(^{\circ}\)S and overall is category 3 (SC-CAMLR-XXVIII, Annex 7, Table 14 and Figure 2).

Conservation Measure 25-02 applies to this Subarea and, in addition to the specific mitigation measures in place, there is also a bird by-catch limit specified in Conservation Measure 41-09. The discharge of offal or discards is prohibited in this Subarea under Conservation Measure 26-01.

In 2008, one mortality of a Crabeater seal (Lobodon carcinophagus) was reported by a vessel in this fishery.


3. Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) fishing

Past estimates of illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) catch in this fishery are shown in Table 1.

Following the recognition of methodological issues regarding the estimation of IUU catch levels since 2011, evidence of IUU presence or activity has continued to be recorded but no corresponding estimates of the IUU catch for Dissostichus spp. have been provided (SC-CAMLR-XXIX, paragraph 6.5). One IUU-listed fishing vessel was observed in Subarea 88.1 during 2008 and an unknown vessel sighting was reported in 2012. Information relating to the retrieval of unidentified fishing gear in Subarea 88.1 in 2017 was submitted by the Republic of Korea and provided to Members in COMM CIRC 17/100.


4. Data collection

4.1. Data collection requirements

The collection of biological data as part of the CCAMLR Scheme of International Scientific Observation (SISO) includes representative samples of length, weight, sex and maturity stage, as well as collection of otoliths for age determination of the target and most frequently taken by-catch species.

This fishery is managed under the umbrella of the exploratory fisheries Conservation Measure 41-01 and, as such, has an associated data collection plan (Annex 41-01/A), a research plan (Annex 41-01/B) and a tagging program (Annex 41-01/C).

In addition to exploratory fishing requirements, a Medium Term Research Plan for the Ross Sea Region has been developed to further increase the quality and volume of data needed to manage the fishery (CCAMLR-XXXIII, paragraph 5.52). This plan includes priority research topics to improve the stock assessment and to understand the ecosystem impacts of fishing. This plan was updated in 2022 (SC-CAMLR-41, paragraphs 3.141 and 5.4).

In 2023, an updated data collection plan was developped for the 2024 fishing season, with updates to the C2 Observer forms (WG-FSA-2023, paragraphs 4.190 and 4.191).


4.2. Summary of available data

Both the vessel’s crew and observers collect fishing effort, catch, and by-catch information.

Following Conservation Measure 22-07, vessels participating in this fishery must report the occurrence of VME indicator organisms on hauled lines. To do so, the vessel’s crew observe lines in segments (1000-hook sections or 1200m sections, whichever is the shorter) and report the number of VME indicator units (either one litre of those VME indicator organisms that can be placed in a 10-litre container, or one kilogram of those VME indicator organisms that do not fit into a 10-litre container). Depending on the number of VME indicator units landed, vessels must immediately report and potentially cease fishing in the area (termed a Risk Area) until further review of the data is completed (see Conservation Measure 22-07). Based on the portion of the line monitored, observers further identify VME indicator organisms to the lowest taxonomic level possible.

The vessel’s crew report total catch of non-VME by-catch (mostly fishes) by coarse taxonomic groups given the taxonomic expertise required to discriminate similar species. Observers collect biological information on toothfish and by-catch specimens at a finer taxonomic resolution, as well as data on individual specimens such as size and maturity.

Summaries of data reported to CCAMLR for the past five years are given in Tables 3 and 4.

Table 3. Summary of VME indicator taxa by-catch, by-catch of other species and biological data reported by vessels crew and observers in each of the last five seasons. By-catch records correspond to the number of observations of total weight and count of individuals for each taxon identified. Observers may take further biological measurements on toothfish and by-catch taxa. Taxonomic identification may occur at different levels.
Data source Data class Variable 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Vessel crew VME line segments 9683 9284 13244 14430 19159
VME indicator units > 5 and < 10 10 1 0 1 4
VME indicator units > 10 0 0 0 0 1
by-catch taxa identified 33 39 34 68 61
records 3227 3386 4201 4379 5863
Observer VME line segments 6737 6246 6295 7509 12269
taxa identified 20 20 21 28 31
weight or volume measurements 1999 2142 2281 2009 2874
toothfish specimens examined 32500 33592 39055 38415 45900
length measurements 32497 33573 39028 38410 45815
weight measurements 32407 32405 37788 37618 45616
sex identifications 32457 33580 39038 37715 45866
maturity stage identifications 32260 33384 38812 37596 45566
gonad weight measurements 27684 27666 34247 35792 42145
otolith samples 9626 10061 11809 12298 14885
by-catch specimens examined 8385 8947 12820 16436 22938
taxa identified 46 46 43 66 46
length measurements 7937 8316 11951 15923 22843
weight measurements** 8297 8554 12794 16292 22095
standard length measurements* 402 318 1051 4206 2999
wingspan measurements* 424 640 574 1045 1582
pelvic length measurements* 417 522 510 919 1182
snout to anus measurements* 2925 3965 6125 7126 12533
sex identifications** 6543 6438 7472 6546 15557
maturity stage identifications** 6232 5673 7157 5786 13079
gonad weight measurements** 2380 2446 1868 1078 5341
otolith samples** 919 1269 1472 475 1916
**: Voluntary records
*: Species-dependent records
Table 4. Summary of biological data for predominant by-catch groups reported by observers (from random subsets of lines) in each of the last five seasons. Taxonomic identification may occur at different levels.
By-catch group Variable 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Macrourus spp. specimens examined 2902 3955 6105 6915 12411
taxa identified 6 6 5 6 5
length measurements 2582 3446 5344 6893 12398
weight measurements** 2899 3950 6093 6909 12205
snout to anus measurements* 2885 3931 6086 6880 12395
sex identifications** 2258 3026 3549 3269 8976
maturity stage identifications** 2232 2909 3491 2983 8130
gonad weight measurements** 75 1339 738 777 4322
otolith samples** 91 851 1181 426 1593
Skates and rays specimens examined 424 940 573 1046 1594
taxa identified 7 6 6 6 7
length measurements 423 932 526 968 1564
weight measurements** 422 557 570 946 1097
wingspan measurements* 424 640 571 1045 1582
pelvic length measurements* 417 522 510 919 1182
sex identifications** 424 907 571 879 1593
maturity stage identifications** 232 515 504 900 948
gonad weight measurements** 0 0 0 1 1
Other fish specimens examined 4921 3949 6075 8049 8869
taxa identified 22 27 26 27 21
length measurements 4910 3934 6070 8046 8856
weight measurements** 4838 3944 6064 8012 8731
standard length measurements* 386 317 1038 4184 2978
sex identifications** 3855 2502 3346 2389 4977
maturity stage identifications** 3764 2249 3162 1900 3999
gonad weight measurements** 2305 1107 1130 300 1018
otolith samples** 827 415 290 49 323
**: Voluntary records
*: Species-dependent records


The counts of by-catch taxa reported above (Table 4) correspond to specimens that have been individually sampled by observers. These are a subset of all the specimens counted by observers and are generally identified at a more precise taxonomic level. The figures below (Figs. 2 and 3) display the distribution of the most frequently examined by-catch taxa in time and space. It is important to note that observers sample a random subset of lines and do not individually examine all taxa; as such these figures are more representative of the distribution of biological observations than the catch of these taxa or their spatial distribution. At a coarse taxonomic level, the total catch of by-catch species groups is provided in section 2.2 above.

Figure 2. Relative frequencies of the most commonly examined by-catch taxa in each of the last five seasons, from the observer data (unweighted raw counts of individually examined specimens). Taxonomic identification may occur at different levels.

Figure 2. Relative frequencies of the most commonly examined by-catch taxa in each of the last five seasons, from the observer data (unweighted raw counts of individually examined specimens). Taxonomic identification may occur at different levels.


Figure 3. Spatial distribution of the most commonly examined by-catch taxa across the last five seasons, from the observer data (unweighted raw counts of individually examined specimens in each cell). The data were aggregated using equal area (100 km x 100 km) cells. Taxonomic identification may occur at different levels. Refer to Figure 1 for more details on the boundaries shown. Coastlines and ice shelves: UK Polar Data Centre/BAS and Natural Earth. Bathymetry: GEBCO. Projection: EPSG 6932 (rotated).

Figure 3. Spatial distribution of the most commonly examined by-catch taxa across the last five seasons, from the observer data (unweighted raw counts of individually examined specimens in each cell). The data were aggregated using equal area (100 km x 100 km) cells. Taxonomic identification may occur at different levels. Refer to Figure 1 for more details on the boundaries shown. Coastlines and ice shelves: UK Polar Data Centre/BAS and Natural Earth. Bathymetry: GEBCO. Projection: EPSG 6932 (rotated).


4.3. Length frequency distributions

The length frequency distributions of D. mawsoni and D. eleginoides caught in this fishery in recent years are shown in Figures 4 and 5 respectively. These length frequency distributions are unweighted; they have not been adjusted for factors such as the size of the catches from which they were collected. The interannual variability exhibited in the figure may reflect changes in the fished population but is also likely to reflect changes in the gear used, the number of vessels in the fishery and the spatial and temporal distributions of fishing.

The length frequency distribution of the catches for D. mawsoni in all areas for this fishery ranged from about 70cm to 190cm (Fig. 4) with a consistent mode at about 140cm in the fishery north of 70\(^{\circ}\)S (N70). The size distributions in the S70 or SRZ depend on the spatial (and depth) distribution of fishing in a given year. The size distribution of fish on the Ross Sea shelf (not shown) is comprised of a mode of smaller fish (80-110 cm) with a pronounced tail of larger fish spanning the full length distribution. Size distributions for D. mawsoni on the shelf are summarised as part of the Ross Sea shelf survey report (WG-FSA-2023/09).

Observations of D. eleginoides length are few and typically smaller than D. mawsoni in this fishery (Fig. 5).


Figure 4. Annual length frequency distributions of *Dissostichus* *mawsoni* caught in this fishery (RSR; Subarea 88.1 and SSRUs 882A-B) (top panel) and the three areas of the fishery. The number of hauls from which fish were measured (N) and the number of fish measured (n) in each year are indicated. Note: length frequency distributions are only shown where more than 150 fish were measured in a given season/area.

Figure 4. Annual length frequency distributions of Dissostichus mawsoni caught in this fishery (RSR; Subarea 88.1 and SSRUs 882A-B) (top panel) and the three areas of the fishery. The number of hauls from which fish were measured (N) and the number of fish measured (n) in each year are indicated. Note: length frequency distributions are only shown where more than 150 fish were measured in a given season/area.


Figure 5. Annual length frequency distributions of *D.* *eleginoides* caught in this fishery (RSR; Subarea 88.1 and SSRUs 882A-B). The number of hauls from which fish were measured (N) and the number of fish measured (n) in each year are indicated. Note: length frequency distributions are only shown where more than 150 fish were measured in a given season/area.

Figure 5. Annual length frequency distributions of D. eleginoides caught in this fishery (RSR; Subarea 88.1 and SSRUs 882A-B). The number of hauls from which fish were measured (N) and the number of fish measured (n) in each year are indicated. Note: length frequency distributions are only shown where more than 150 fish were measured in a given season/area.


4.4. Tagging

Under Conservation Measure 41-01, each longline vessel fishing in exploratory fisheries for either D. mawsoni or D. eleginoides is required to tag and release toothfish at the rate of 1 fish per tonne of green weight caught throughout the season since 2004 following the CCAMLR tagging protocol. In order to ensure that there is sufficient overlap between the length distribution of all fish caught and those fish that are tagged, a vessel is required to achieve a minimum tag-overlap statistic (see Annex 41-01/C, footnote 3). The requirement to achieve a minimum tag-overlap statistic of 50% was first introduced for 2011 and this was then increased to 60% for 2012 and subsequent seasons (Table 5). The tagging data is used as the main source of information on trends in abundance for stock assessment.

To date in this area, 74375 D. mawsoni have been tagged and released (4701 have been recaptured; Table 6), and, 1340 D. eleginoides have been tagged and released (118 have been recaptured; Table 7).

Vessel-specific tag-detection rates (the relative rate at which tagged fish are recaptured by a vessel) and recapture rates (the relative rate of recapture of fish that were tagged by a vessel) were developed using a methodology which controls for the spatial and temporal variability of fishing operations by pairing each individual tag release or recapture event with all other fishing events which occurred in the same time and place (i.e., within a specific distance and in the same fishing season) (WG-SAM-14/30). The resulting indices were used to derive the effective tag release and recaptures for each vessel in the tagging dataset used for the assessment model (WG-FSA-17/36). Both indices, for the fishery as a whole and weighted by the relative catches of each vessel, show effective tagging rates at about 65% and effective tag-detection rates at about 85%; both generally decreasing over time. This decrease is due to the combination of changes in individual vessel performance over time and changes in relative contribution of vessels with lower rates; as such it does not indicate a decrease in rates for all vessels.

Table 5. Annual tagging rate (number of fish tagged per tonne of total catch), reported by vessels operating in this exploratory fishery (Subarea 88.1 and SSRUs 882A-B). The tag-overlap statistics (CM 41-01) for D. mawsoni and D. eleginoides respectively are provided in brackets (NC: Tag-overlap statistic is Not Calculated for less than 30 fish tagged; -: no fish were tagged). In the last row, the tagging rate and tag-overlap statistic were computed using all fish tagged and all fish caught in the area.
Fishing Season
Flag State Vessel name 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Argentina Argenova XXI 1.1 (52,NC)
Australia Antarctic Aurora 1 (83.2,NC) 1 (81.4,-)
Australia Antarctic Discovery 1.1 (74.9,NC) 1 (90.8,NC) 1.2 (NC,-) 1 (71.9,-) 1.1 (83.2,NC) 1.1 (74.9,-) 1.2 (72.2,-)
Chile Globalpesca I 1.5 (NC,-)
Chile Puerto Ballena 1 (NC,-) 1.1 (85.1,-)
Spain Tronio 1 (69.3,NC) 1 (68.6,NC) 1 (68.7,-) 1 (90.1,NC) 1 (76.8,-) 1.1 (79.5,NC) 1.1 (90.2,NC) 1.1 (67.8,NC) 1 (80.7,-) 1 (89.1,NC) 1 (66.1,-) 1.1 (73.8,NC) 2.7 (61.4,-) 2.8 (63.3,NC) 3.2 (67.4,-)
Spain Yanque 1.2 (79,NC)
France Sainte Rose 1.5 (81.7,-)
United Kingdom Argos Froyanes 1 (52.7,-) 1 (75.1,-) 1.3 (60.6,-) 1 (90.9,-) 1 (88.7,NC) 1.5 (89.3,NC) 1.1 (85.6,NC) 1 (75.9,-) 1.3 (90.9,-) 1.1 (90.7,-) 1.7 (80,-) 1.1 (83.8,NC)
United Kingdom Argos Georgia 1.1 (47.1,NC) 1 (69.1,NC) 1 (89.3,NC) 1.1 (77.6,NC) 1.1 (79.6,-) 1.1 (92,-) 1.2 (83.2,-) 2.2 (84.1,-) 1.2 (85.4,-) 1.1 (86.9,-) 1.1 (79.9,NC)
United Kingdom Argos Helena 1.1 (85.5,NC)
United Kingdom Nordic Prince 1.3 (87.4,-) 1 (87.8,-) 1.2 (83.8,-) 1.1 (88.4,-)
Japan Shinsei Maru No. 8 1.4 (NC,NC) 1.1 (86.5,NC) 1.6 (73.2,NC) 2 (75,NC)
Republic of Korea Blue Ocean 1.1 (87.3,NC) 1.1 (82.5,NC) 1 (82.8,-)
Republic of Korea Greenstar 1.1 (87.5,-) 1 (77,-) 1.1 (84.3,-)
Republic of Korea Hong Jin No. 701 1.3 (71.8,NC) 1.1 (81.8,-) 1.1 (69.4,-) 1.1 (81.5,NC) 1 (74.1,-) 1.8 (92.6,-) 1.5 (89.5,-) 1.6 (78.7,-) 1.7 (88.6,-)
Republic of Korea Hong Jin No. 707 1.1 (49.8,-) 1.1 (63,64.8) 1.1 (71.6,NC) 1 (81.7,-) 1.1 (81.4,-) 1.9 (79.7,-) 2.6 (90.7,-) 1 (91.5,-) 1.9 (90.1,-)
Republic of Korea Insung No. 1 1.1 (22.9,-)
Republic of Korea Insung No. 3 1.5 (92.6,NC)
Republic of Korea Insung No. 5 1.6 (90.8,-)
Republic of Korea Jung Woo No. 2 1.2 (25.9,-) 1.1 (92.5,-) 1.2 (90.8,NC)
Republic of Korea Jung Woo No. 3 1.1 (42.2,-) 1 (87.6,-) 1.2 (85.7,NC)
Republic of Korea Kingstar 1.1 (89.2,-) 1.1 (77.8,-) 1 (89.2,-) 1 (89.5,-) 1.2 (84.1,NC) 1.1 (86.6,NC) 1.1 (96.5,NC)
Republic of Korea Kostar 1.1 (94.2,-) 1.1 (78,-) 1 (82,-) 1 (80.1,-) 1 (83.3,-) 1.1 (81.4,-) 1.1 (71.5,-)
Republic of Korea Sae In Pioneer 2 (88.1,-)
Republic of Korea Southern Ocean 1.1 (83.6,-) 1.2 (80.9,-) 1.5 (82.3,NC) 1.6 (86.3,-)
Republic of Korea Sunstar 1.2 (85,-) 1.1 (76.3,-) 1.1 (72.5,-) 1.1 (87.1,-) 1 (83.3,-) 1 (80.1,-) 1.1 (81.3,-) 1.1 (89,-) 1 (87.8,-) 1 (81.1,NC) 1.1 (85.3,NC) 1.1 (91.1,NC)
Namibia Helena Ndume 1.1 (84.3,-)
Norway Argos Georgia 1.1 (85.4,-) 1.4 (80.4,NC)
Norway Seljevaer 1 (78.8,-) 1.1 (76.2,NC) 1 (80.7,NC) 1.2 (69.4,NC)
New Zealand Antarctic Chieftain 1 (61.5,-) 1 (96.4,NC) 1.2 (89,NC) 1.1 (NC,NC)
New Zealand Janas 1 (79.2,-) 1 (84.8,NC) 1.3 (80.9,NC) 1 (91.5,NC) 1.1 (88.1,NC) 1.8 (82.6,NC) 1.6 (92,NC) 1.1 (90,NC) 1.1 (83.8,-) 2.5 (88.6,NC) 1.1 (88.8,NC) 1.1 (86.2,NC) 1 (89.8,NC) 1.1 (87.4,NC) 1.5 (81.6,NC)
New Zealand San Aotea II 1.1 (78.6,NC) 1.1 (88.2,NC) 2.7 (87,NC) 1.8 (80,NC) 1.6 (88,NC) 1.7 (86.5,NC) 1.7 (86.3,NC) 1.8 (82.4,NC) 1.6 (85.1,NC) 2.1 (83.2,NC) 3 (86.2,NC) 1.8 (77.2,NC) 2.3 (85.5,-) 2.4 (87.8,NC) 1.3 (88.7,NC)
New Zealand San Aspiring 1.1 (88.4,NC) 1.1 (89.6,NC) 1.1 (92.2,NC) 1.2 (92.7,NC) 1.1 (91.3,NC) 1.1 (92.8,NC) 1.1 (87.9,NC) 1.1 (87.6,NC) 1.1 (75.8,NC) 1.1 (84.6,-) 1.1 (86.3,-) 1 (81.9,-) 1 (89.3,-) 1.1 (87.1,NC) 1.1 (90.8,NC)
Russian Federation Alpha Crux 1 (61.6,-)
Russian Federation Chio Maru No. 3 1.7 (77.2,NC) 1.5 (77.7,NC)
Russian Federation Gold Gate 1.3 (87.9,NC)
Russian Federation Mys Marii 1.1 (NC,-) 1 (67.5,NC)
Russian Federation Mys Velikan 1 (80.5,-)
Russian Federation Oladon 1 1 (85.3,-)
Russian Federation Ostrovka 1 (NC,-)
Russian Federation Palmer 1.2 (83.5,-) 1 (79.7,-) 1 (70,NC) 1 (65.4,NC) 1.3 (69.3,-) 1 (62.1,-) 1 (82.9,-)
Russian Federation Sparta 1.2 (63,NC) 1.5 (NC,NC) 1.1 (NC,-) 1.1 (NC,-) 1.1 (36,-) 1.1 (86.5,NC)
Russian Federation Ugulan 1 (74.2,NC) 1 (78.3,NC) 1.1 (71.5,-)
Russian Federation Volk Arktiki 1.2 (83.7,-)
Russian Federation Yantar 31 1.2 (89.5,-) 1.1 (83.1,-) 1 (80.5,-) 1 (72.5,NC) 1.1 (85.8,-)
Ukraine Calipso 1 (73.3,-) 1 (86.2,NC) 2.2 (68.9,NC) 1.1 (87.3,NC) 1 (79.5,NC) 1.1 (83.8,NC)
Ukraine Koreiz 1 (77,NC) 1.1 (89.1,-)
Ukraine Marigolds 1.3 (NC,-) 1.1 (73.1,-) 1.3 (83,-) 1.2 (83.9,-) 2.1 (81.7,NC) 1.1 (78.8,-) 1.2 (78.3,-) 1.4 (89.4,-)
Ukraine Polus 1 0.9 (NC,-)
Ukraine Poseydon I 1 (67.5,-)
Ukraine Simeiz 1.2 (43.2,-) 1.1 (82.8,NC) 1.3 (NC,-) 1.1 (85.1,-) 1.3 (NC,NC) 1.1 (86.6,-) 1.1 (92.5,NC) 1.1 (85.6,-)
Uruguay Altamar 1.5 (60.6,NC) 1.3 (87.3,-)
Uruguay Ocean Azul 1.1 (79.5,-) 1 (67.7,-)
Total 1.1 (70.6,NC) 1.1 (88.3,73.5) 1.2 (88.6,NC) 1.2 (94.3,NC) 1.1 (90.6,NC) 1.2 (89.8,NC) 1.2 (94.2,NC) 1.1 (84.5,NC) 1.2 (90.1,NC) 1.4 (87.6,NC) 1.2 (88.9,NC) 1.4 (84,80.6) 1.4 (84.5,87.7) 1.4 (83.8,NC) 1.4 (89,NC)


Table 6. Number of D. mawsoni tagged in recent fishing Seasons in this exploratory fishery (Subarea 88.1 and SSRUs 882A-B). The number of fish recaptured by each vessel in each Season is provided in brackets.
Fishing Season
Flag State Vessel name 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Argentina Argenova XXI 33 (2)
Australia Antarctic Aurora 117 (20) 99 (17)
Australia Antarctic Discovery 85 (2) 148 (36) 15 (3) 74 (9) 116 (26) 35 (0) 84 (2)
Chile Globalpesca I 21 (8)
Chile Puerto Ballena 26 (10) 58 (11)
Spain Tronio 308 (23) 429 (12) 546 (8) 388 (12) 298 (22) 311 (20) 230 (18) 359 (30) 180 (24) 307 (19) 192 (10) 199 (28) 758 (24) 609 (8) 117 (4)
Spain Yanque 46 (7)
France Sainte Rose 79 (11)
United Kingdom Argos Froyanes 158 (4) 332 (28) 38 (1) 183 (23) 220 (25) 389 (30) 70 (4) 230 (20) 221 (14) 120 (20) 223 (10) 160 (9)
United Kingdom Argos Georgia 51 (2) 213 (48) 300 (13) 293 (10) 244 (22) 287 (26) 263 (37) 691 (43) 246 (14) 97 (16) 124 (24)
United Kingdom Argos Helena 82 (19)
United Kingdom Nordic Prince 369 (78) 156 (34) 81 (22) 331 (27)
Japan Shinsei Maru No. 8 24 (0) 74 (7) 143 (4) 130 (3)
Republic of Korea Blue Ocean 336 (11) 365 (13) 377 (11)
Republic of Korea Greenstar 333 (21) 331 (11) 269 (40)
Republic of Korea Hong Jin No. 701 106 (0) 209 (4) 39 (0) 34 (1) 277 (10) 388 (4) 333 (17) 444 (21) 301 (12)
Republic of Korea Hong Jin No. 707 368 (25) 218 (9) 462 (8) 291 (1) 242 (10) 592 (9) 540 (3) 303 (28) 522 (7)
Republic of Korea Insung No. 1 313 (29)
Republic of Korea Insung No. 3 249 (10)
Republic of Korea Insung No. 5 427 (16)
Republic of Korea Jung Woo No. 2 268 (3) 285 (0) 186 (3)
Republic of Korea Jung Woo No. 3 185 (8) 157 (2) 236 (5)
Republic of Korea Kingstar 276 (11) 128 (14) 246 (17) 293 (17) 245 (13) 228 (31) 299 (39)
Republic of Korea Kostar 223 (1) 117 (1) 352 (2) 312 (15) 313 (15) 299 (17) 120 (12)
Republic of Korea Sae In Pioneer 414 (7)
Republic of Korea Southern Ocean 64 (0) 252 (1) 398 (17) 392 (24)
Republic of Korea Sunstar 154 (4) 122 (1) 199 (6) 206 (7) 218 (4) 224 (15) 167 (10) 262 (6) 350 (5) 214 (17) 281 (11) 322 (31)
Namibia Helena Ndume 65 (19)
Norway Argos Georgia 203 (25) 243 (28)
Norway Seljevaer 178 (14) 238 (53) 264 (55) 251 (27)
New Zealand Antarctic Chieftain 164 (36) 238 (18) 127 (2) 25 (1)
New Zealand Janas 415 (34) 172 (4) 168 (0) 130 (13) 150 (14) 270 (4) 338 (42) 206 (12) 139 (27) 420 (13) 172 (18) 172 (28) 185 (41) 192 (41) 194 (47)
New Zealand San Aotea II 288 (24) 321 (50) 289 (4) 348 (21) 354 (70) 299 (20) 412 (50) 457 (22) 338 (10) 466 (33) 284 (14) 546 (78) 270 (28) 468 (44) 219 (39)
New Zealand San Aspiring 513 (59) 199 (19) 527 (62) 243 (32) 307 (76) 193 (40) 408 (64) 336 (37) 300 (59) 344 (51) 175 (26) 309 (65) 186 (45) 294 (53) 153 (38)
Russian Federation Alpha Crux 60 (17)
Russian Federation Chio Maru No. 3 242 (4) 302 (4)
Russian Federation Gold Gate 98 (1)
Russian Federation Mys Marii 21 (1) 44 (4)
Russian Federation Mys Velikan 82 (4)
Russian Federation Oladon 1 188 (3)
Russian Federation Ostrovka 18 (3)
Russian Federation Palmer 54 (7) 68 (0) 336 (1) 279 (0) 467 (2) 213 (1) 375 (0)
Russian Federation Sparta 110 (8) 0 (0) 7 (1) 28 (6) 31 (3) 55 (5)
Russian Federation Ugulan 41 (3) 49 (2) 81 (3)
Russian Federation Volk Arktiki 99 (3)
Russian Federation Yantar 31 362 (7) 82 (8) 93 (0) 178 (2) 126 (5)
Ukraine Calipso 123 (12) 122 (17) 526 (3) 201 (4) 295 (17) 73 (5)
Ukraine Koreiz 163 (30) 163 (16)
Ukraine Marigolds 23 (5) 43 (7) 158 (7) 48 (4) 200 (1) 55 (3) 31 (0) 54 (0)
Ukraine Polus 1 8 (0)
Ukraine Poseydon I 30 (2)
Ukraine Simeiz 75 (1) 73 (4) 16 (1) 160 (7) 18 (0) 183 (22) 253 (33) 228 (26)
Uruguay Altamar 55 (0) 89 (10)
Uruguay Ocean Azul 68 (8) 36 (11)
Total 3064 (249) 3032 (206) 3827 (131) 3581 (213) 2449 (309) 2841 (181) 2935 (253) 3136 (189) 3115 (265) 4143 (335) 3426 (225) 4340 (351) 4554 (334) 4528 (361) 4439 (397)


Table 7. Number of D. eleginoides tagged in recent fishing Seasons in this exploratory fishery (Subarea 88.1 and SSRUs 882A-B). The number of fish recaptured by each vessel in each Season is provided in brackets.
Fishing Season
Flag State Vessel name 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Argentina Argenova XXI 0 (0)
Australia Antarctic Aurora 1 (0) 0 (0)
Australia Antarctic Discovery 0 (0) 1 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 4 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Chile Globalpesca I 0 (0)
Chile Puerto Ballena 0 (0) 0 (0)
Spain Tronio 0 (0) 1 (2) 0 (0) 1 (0) 0 (0) 2 (0) 0 (0) 2 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 5 (2) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Spain Yanque 0 (0)
France Sainte Rose 0 (0)
United Kingdom Argos Froyanes 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (0)
United Kingdom Argos Georgia 0 (1) 0 (0) 1 (0) 3 (1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
United Kingdom Argos Helena 1 (0)
United Kingdom Nordic Prince 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Japan Shinsei Maru No. 8 11 (0) 15 (1) 2 (0) 4 (3)
Republic of Korea Blue Ocean 9 (1) 1 (1) 0 (0)
Republic of Korea Greenstar 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Republic of Korea Hong Jin No. 701 3 (6) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Republic of Korea Hong Jin No. 707 0 (0) 34 (5) 0 (1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Republic of Korea Insung No. 1 0 (0)
Republic of Korea Insung No. 3 1 (0)
Republic of Korea Insung No. 5 0 (0)
Republic of Korea Jung Woo No. 2 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (1)
Republic of Korea Jung Woo No. 3 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Republic of Korea Kingstar 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 5 (3) 3 (3) 1 (0)
Republic of Korea Kostar 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Republic of Korea Sae In Pioneer 0 (0)
Republic of Korea Southern Ocean 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (0) 0 (0)
Republic of Korea Sunstar 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (4) 2 (1) 1 (0)
Namibia Helena Ndume 0 (0)
Norway Argos Georgia 0 (0) 0 (0)
Norway Seljevaer 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (1)
New Zealand Antarctic Chieftain 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (2) 0 (0)
New Zealand Janas 0 (0) 0 (2) 0 (0) 0 (0) 4 (0) 3 (2) 17 (1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (0) 0 (1) 7 (3) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
New Zealand San Aotea II 0 (0) 2 (0) 15 (4) 0 (0) 4 (4) 0 (1) 2 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 6 (0) 0 (0)
New Zealand San Aspiring 2 (1) 3 (0) 1 (1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (0) 0 (0) 0 (1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Russian Federation Alpha Crux 0 (0)
Russian Federation Chio Maru No. 3 0 (0) 2 (1)
Russian Federation Gold Gate 1 (3)
Russian Federation Mys Marii 0 (0) 0 (0)
Russian Federation Mys Velikan 0 (0)
Russian Federation Oladon 1 0 (0)
Russian Federation Ostrovka 0 (0)
Russian Federation Palmer 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (0) 1 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Russian Federation Sparta 0 (0) 2 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Russian Federation Ugulan 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Russian Federation Volk Arktiki 0 (0)
Russian Federation Yantar 31 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Ukraine Calipso 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Ukraine Koreiz 2 (0) 0 (0)
Ukraine Marigolds 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Ukraine Polus 1 0 (0)
Ukraine Poseydon I 0 (0)
Ukraine Simeiz 0 (0) 11 (1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 4 (2) 0 (0) 1 (0) 0 (0)
Uruguay Altamar 0 (0) 0 (0)
Uruguay Ocean Azul 0 (0) 0 (0)
Total 2 (2) 41 (12) 25 (16) 5 (1) 20 (5) 6 (4) 20 (1) 3 (1) 1 (1) 3 (0) 1 (1) 34 (7) 36 (9) 20 (5) 6 (3)


5. Research

5.1. Status of the science

Recruitment surveys


The Ross Sea shelf survey has been conducted since 2012. The objectives of the survey include monitoring the abundance and age structure of sub-adult (< 110 cm TL) toothfish in the southern Ross Sea and monitoring trends in larger (large sub-adult and adult) toothfish in two areas of importance to mammalian toothfish predators. Catches and size structure are similar among the areas but consistently show year class progression in the age distributions (WG-FSA-2023/09). The survey age structure and local biomass estimations were incorporated into the 2023 assessment and were shown to stabilise the index of year class strength; on this basis, continuation of the survey has been recommended (WG-FSA-2022/41 Rev. 1).

Results of the 2024 survey were presented in WG-FSA-IMAF-2024/65, noting that only 12 stations in the core survey area could be completed because freeze-up occurred following an anomalously lengthened commercial season, and the triggering of the VME indicator taxa by-catch threshold due to a high catch of basket stars.

Standardised CPUE


Standardised catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) analyses of D. mawsoni in the Ross Sea are updated routinely (WG-FSA-2023/19). In 2006, it was concluded that the CPUE indices did not appear to be monitoring abundance of toothfish in the Ross Sea fishery (SC-CAMLR-XXV, Annex 5, paragraph 5.58). The trend in CPUE shows increases and decreases throughout the period among the north, slope and shelf fisheries. The CPUE trend through time was not expected to reflect changes in biomass but rather location of fishing and fisher experience as the fishery developed.

Sex, length, and age Composition


Approximately 800 D. mawsoni otoliths collected by observers from New Zealand vessels have been selected for ageing each year, and used to construct annual area-specific age-length keys (ALKs). In the Ross Sea, annual ALKs for each sex are developed and applied to the shelf/slope fisheries and the north fishery separately. The annual ALKs were applied to the scaled length-frequency distributions for each year to produce annual catch-at-age distributions (WG-FSA-18/46). There has been a small increase in the proportion of males in the north, and to a much lesser extent on the slope and shelf, over time (WG-FSA-18/46) even after discounting the first two years’ data (which are likely to be unrepresentative because fishing occurred mainly in shallow water in SSRU 881G).

In 2019, the proportion of males in N70 and the SRZ showed an increasing trend through time (WG-FSA-2019/07). These trends may be the result of spatial differences in fishing through time. No trends through time were apparent in scaled median, 10th and 90th percentile of length, or sex-specific condition factor. Antarctic toothfish are older in the North compared to other areas, which is a reflection of ontogenetic migration and depths fished in each area (larger/older fish tend to be deeper). Interannual variability in age distributions are likely due to differences in depth and location fished within each management area. No trends were apparent within each of the management areas (WG-FSA-2019/07).

In 2021, scaled annual length and age distributions of the catch showed several modes of strong recruitment progressing through time on the slope (south of 70\(^{\circ}\)S), while the size and age distributions in the north had not changed WG-FSA-2021/24. There was a small change in the sex ratio of Antarctic toothfish, with a gradual pattern of more males caught in all areas until 2015. The number of Antarctic toothfish recaptured in 2020-21 was higher than the average annual number over the past decade, likely a consequence of the concentration of fishing effort on the Ross Sea slope with the implementation of the RSrMPA.

In 2022, scaled length distributions showed no decrease in the size of fish caught through time in any of the management areas, although there was strong interannual variability in the area south of 70\(^{\circ}\)S that was likely driven by changes in the fine-scale spatial distribution of fishing effort or the influence of strong and weak year classes entering the fishery. There was a small change in the sex ratio of Antarctic toothfish catch, with a gradual pattern of more males caught in all areas until 2015. The number of Antarctic toothfish recaptured in 2021 and 2022 was higher than the average annual number of recaptures over the past decade, likely a consequence of the concentration of fishing effort on the Ross Sea slope following the implementation of the RSrMPA.

Sea-ice


The effect of sea-ice has a major influence on fishing operations in high latitudes. The major effects of sea-ice are firstly to restrict or deny access to preferred fishing grounds, but of much more consequence, to hamper fishing operations, with resulting effects on catches and time spent on fishing grounds. An ice index developed for Subarea 88.1 provides a quantitative index of the influence of variable sea-ice conditions on the operation of a fishery at the resolution of a season (WG-FSA-15/35).

Antarctic toothfish diet


In 2021, WG-FSA-2021/35 and WG-FSA-2021/36 presented results of diet analyses using molecular methods and stomach contents analyses. In line with previous studies, the diet of D. mawsoni mainly comprised fish (mostly Macrourus caml and Cryodraco antarcticus) and small amounts of cephalopods and crustaceans WG-FSA-2021/35. Results indicated that D. mawsoni is an opportunistic piscivorous fish WG-FSA-2021/36.

In 2022, WG-FSA-2022/27 and WG-FSA-2022/28 presented analyses of diet composition, feeding strategy and spatial diet variations of Antarctic toothfish. Macrouridae, Chionobathyscus dewitti and mollusks were found to be dominant prey items, and diet was found to differ between slope and shelf areas, reflecting the different prey assemblages between these areas. Also, a genetic study using microsatellite markers (WG-FSA-2022/29 Rev. 1) reported a higher genetic diversity in the Ross Sea region than other areas within Area 88.

In 2024, WG-FSA-IMAF-2024/38 presented an analysis of the diet of Antarctic toothfish based on the 2022/23 Ross Sea shelf survey. Fish, particularly Nototheniidae (dominated by Trematomus spp.), were the main prey on the shelf. On the slope, M. caml was the predominant prey. These findings suggest spatial variability in the diet is linked to prey availability (WG-FSA-IMAF-2024, paragraphs 4.167 and 4.168).

Stock Assessment


In 2024, WG-FSA-IMAF-2024 considered a large work program for integrated toothfish stock assessments, with a focus on the performance of the decision rules, the effects of spatial bias in tagging data, approaches to select recruitment data for stock status projections, and management strategy evaluations (WG-FSA-IMAF-2024, paragraphs 4.30–4.50).


5.2. Research plans

The medium-term research plan for this area has been developed and implemented by 5 Members. It is designed to collect the data required to improve the stock assessment and to improve the understanding of the potential impacts of the fishery on the broader ecosystem. Additional ecosystem objectives and research priorities are specified in Conservation Measure 91-05 and in the Ross Sea region MPA research and monitoring plan, which details a large multi-member research effort to further understand ecosystem dynamics and the potential impacts of fishing in the Ross Sea region (SC-CAMLR-XXXVI/20).

Additional research has occurred under Conservation Measure 24-01 (with more than 5t toothfish catch, including two winter longline surveys (WG-SAM-15/47, WG-FSA-16/37, WG-FSA-18/40) to study the timing and distribution of Antarctic toothfish spawning and early life history.

In 2021, WG-FSA-2021/30 indicated that the 5-year report of activities in support of the Research and Monitoring Plan for the RSrMPA was expected, and proposed a workshop to:

  1. Identify fishery based medium-term research objectives,

  2. Develop an associated fishery data collection plan to meet the research objectives,

  3. Identify high priority non-Olympic fishery surveys or research activities, and

  4. Identify voluntary programmes to develop and test novel data collection mechanisms

In 2022, WG-FSA-2022/44 reported on the Workshop on the Ross Sea Data Collection Plan 2022, WG-FSA-2022/46 presented a review of progress against the medium-term research plan and WG-FSA-2022/45 presented a proposal to update this plan (including research activities and voluntary programmes, and a data collection plan). The updated plan, focused on maintaining ecosystem processes and functions and monitoring, included 7 themes each with specific objectives:

  1. Maintenance of the Antarctic toothfish population in the Ross Sea region above target levels,

  2. Top predators,

  3. By-catch,

  4. Ecosystem effects of fishing,

  5. Marine debris,

  6. Alien species,

  7. Climate change.

SC-CAMLR-41/BG/36 presented a compilation of Member activity reports related to the Ross Sea Region Marine Protected Area totaling 192 projects (26 active grants and 166 published studies) from 20 Members, in the period from 2016 to 2022.


6. Stock status

6.1. Summary of current status

A stock assessment estimated the equilibrium pre-exploitation spawning stock biomass to be 77,920 tonnes (95% CIs 72,060–84,690 tonnes) and the current stock status to be 65.2% B0 (95% CIs 62.3–68.1% B0). This assessment was conducted using Casal2 software.


6.2. Assessment method

This fishery (Subarea 88.1 and SSRUs 882A-B) for D. mawsoni was assessed using a Casal2 Bayesian sex- and age-structured integrated stock assessment model.


6.3. Year of last assessment, year of next assessment

Assessments are reviewed biennially, the last assessment was in 2024.


7. Climate Change and environmental variability

The impact of Anthropogenic climate change in the short-term could be expected to be related to changes in sea ice and physical access to fishing grounds, whereas longer-term implications are likely to include changes in ecosystem productivity affecting target stocks (FAO 2018).

In anticipation of potential impacts of climate change on targeted fish stocks, the Scientific Committee indicated that changes in productivity parameters may impact assessments and management advice, and these changes may be related to long-term environmental change, shorter-term variability, or potential effects of fishing (SC-CAMLR-XXXVII paragraph 3.51, Annex 9 paragraph 2.28).

The parameters that could be evaluated for the effects of environmental variability and change would include mean recruitment, recruitment variability, mean length-at-age, mean weight-at-length, natural mortality, and maturity ogives.

Patterns in recruitment from the assessment model, analyses of residuals in fits to length-weight relationships, and analysis of residuals in the mean length-at-age showed no evidence of trends or variability over time that would influence the management for Antarctic toothfish in this area.

Other factors that may impact assumptions underlying the assessments that could also be considered, including stock distribution (for example, for its impact on tagged fish distribution or research survey interpretation), sex ratio (indicating maturation or other sex specific changes), and the ages or lengths observed in the fishery (indicating changes in vulnerability patterns or mortality).

The workplan associated with the impacts of climate change on this fishery is to:

  1. Use historical data to investigate trends in key parameters affecting estimates of toothfish yield (and hence management advice).

  2. If trends are identified, adjust parameters in stock assessment and yield estimate to allow for trends continuing in future.

  3. Investigate evidence for trends being related to physical, oceanographic or ecological drivers, but note that establishing causality of trends may not be possible and is not essential.


In 2022, the Commission recognised that climate change is already having effects in the Convention Area (CCAMLR-41, paragraph 6.3) and agreed that it needed to act urgently to prepare for, and adapt to, the effects of climate change on the marine ecosystems within the Convention Area (CCAMLR-41, paragraph 6.5). The Commission noted (CCAMLR-41, paragraph 6.4) that the Scientific Committee had incorporated climate change into its advice (SC-CAMLR-41, paragraph 7.8) and through discussions at the SC-Symposium (SC-CAMLR-41, Annex 11) had also added climate change to the work plans and terms of reference of its Working Groups (SC-CAMLR-41, paragraph 7.14). The Commission adopted (CCAMLR-41, paragraph 6.28) Resolution 36/41.

In 2023, the Scientific Committee held a workshop on Climate Change (WS-CC-2023) which made recommendations regarding monitoring and management actions CCAMLR could progress to document and track the effects of climate change in the Convention Area. The recommendations were incorporated into the workplan of the Scientific Committee. Further, the Scientific Committee recommended that summaries of evidence for changes in stock assessment parameters or processes that could be due to the effects of environmental variability or climate change be developed for all fisheries (SC-CAMLR-42, paragraph 2.149).

In 2024, Members developed such summaries, in the form of tables, for fisheries in Subarea 48.3, Divisions 58.5.1 and 58.5.2 and in the Ross Sea region (Table 8).


Parameter or process
Evidence for trends and potential drivers
Table 8. Table summarising evidence for changes in stock assessment and population parameters or processes that could be due to the effects of environmental variability or climate change in the Antarctic toothfish fishery in Subareas 88.1 and 88.2A-B (WG-FSA-IMAF-2024/71).
Recruitment Mean recruitment Patterns in recruitment from the assessment model showed no evidence of trend over time (Dunn and Devine, 2024).
Recruitment variability The time series is currently not long enough to formally evaluate changes in variability but the depletion rule was not a constraint in the application of the CCAMLR decision rules in the most recent assessment (Dunn and Devine, 2024). Recruitment patterns have indicated an approximate decadal cycle and yield calculations propose using recent 10-years estimated recruitment where this was lower than the historical mean recruitment (Dunn and Devine, 2024).
Age at maturity No analyses have investigated potential changes in age or length at maturity (Parker and Marriott 2012).
Stock-recruit relationship Recent recruitments are consistent with the stock relationship recruitment assumptions but the time series of recruitment is not long enough to determine if the stock recruitment relationship was affected by climate change (Dunn and Devine, 2024). Long term monitoring of mean recruitment and its relationship to spawning stock biomass may be able to be used to determine if changes in the relationship occur in future years.
Natural mortality From direct predation Not known
Not from direct predation Not known
Growth rates Age-length residual patterns across cohorts suggest that there have been small long-term fluctuations in mean size at age following a roughly decadal cycle (Dunn and Parker 2019).
Length-weight Patterns of length-weight relationship showed no evidence of trends or variability over time (Dunn and Parker 2019).
Sex ratio No evidence of changes in sex ratio in the catch or the changes RSSS that may be explained by climate change (Devine 2024).
Spatial distribution No evidence of a change in the spatial distribution for distribution Antarctic toothfish in the Ross Sea region from the analysis of fishing effort data (Devine 2024). However any changes in spatial distribution outside the historical fishing footprint are not known.
Stock structure No new evidence to suggest the stock structure hypothesis for Antarctic toothfish in the Ross Sea has altered from current stock structure hypotheses (Hanchet et al. 2008).
Locations of spawning and site fidelity Not known
Depredation No evidence for any changes in rates or occurrence of mortality depredation from either fisher or observer observations - only rare instances of depredation mortality have been observed in the Ross Sea (Devine 2024).


References

McMillan, P., T. Iwamoto, A. Stewart and P.J. Smith. 2012. A new species of grenadier, genus Macrourus (Teleostei, Gadiformes, Macrouridae) from the southern hemisphere and a revision of the genus. Zootaxa, 3165: 1-24.

Pinkerton, M., P.J. McMillan, J. Forman, P. Marriott, P. Horn, S.J. Bury and J. Brown. 2013. Distribution, morphology and ecology of Macrourus whitsoni and M. caml (gadiformes, macrouridae) in the Ross Sea region. CCAMLR Science, 20: 37-61.

Additional Resources