Antarctic Toothfish, *Dissostichus mawsoni* Norman, 1937.

Antarctic Toothfish, Dissostichus mawsoni Norman, 1937.



Map of the management areas within the CAMLR Convention Area. Division 58.4.2, the region discussed in this report is shaded in green. Throughout this report, “2022” refers to the 2021/22 CCAMLR fishing season (from 1 December 2021 to 30 November 2022).

Map of the management areas within the CAMLR Convention Area. Division 58.4.2, the region discussed in this report is shaded in green. Throughout this report, “2022” refers to the 2021/22 CCAMLR fishing season (from 1 December 2021 to 30 November 2022).



1. Introduction to the fishery

1.1. History

This report describes the exploratory longline fishery for Antarctic toothfish (Dissostichus mawsoni) in Division 58.4.2. This fishery was first agreed by the Commission in 2000 and started as a trawl fishery for spiny icefish (Chaenodraco wilsoni), striped-eye rockcod (Lepidonotothen kempi), Antarctic rockcod (Trematomus eulepidotus) and Antarctic silverfish (Pleuragramma antarctica) and an exploratory trawl fishery for toothfish (Dissostichus spp.) (Conservation Measure 186/XVIII). In 2001 and 2002, the exploratory trawl fishery was also permitted in association with a new fishery for grenadier (Macrourus spp.). In 2003, the fishery for Dissostichus spp. in Division 58.4.2 changed to an exploratory longline fishery and since 2004 has targeted primarily D. mawsoni. Prior to 2017, this fishery was classified as an exploratory fishery for Dissostichus spp., however, in order to better align the target species with the assessment process the target species was specified as D. mawsoni, with any Patagonian toothfish (D. eleginoides) caught counting towards the catch limit for D. mawsoni.


1.2. Conservation Measures currently in force

The current limits on the exploratory fishery for D. mawsoni in Division 58.4.2 are described in Conservation Measure 41-05.

Figure 1: Location of Small Scale Research Units and Research Blocks in Division 58.4.2. The fishable depth range (600m-1800m) is highlighted in shades of green.

Figure 1: Location of Small Scale Research Units and Research Blocks in Division 58.4.2. The fishable depth range (600m-1800m) is highlighted in shades of green.


1.3. Active vessels

In 2022, 2 vessel participated in this fishery. For the 2023 fishing season, a total of 4 vessels notified their intention to participate in this fishery (2 from Australia; 2 from France).


1.4. Timeline of spatial management

In 2014, a Research Block (5842_1; Fig. 1) was designated in Division 58.4.2 and catch limits applied. This Research Block was designed to ensure that research fishing occurred in those areas with a high probability of recapturing tagged fish. In 2021, a second Research Block (5842_2; Fig. 1) was designated to increase the spatial representativeness of the data collected within this Division. Fishing in this Division is restricted to the Research Blocks only. Further details on the research conducted in this Division are given in section 5.


2. Reported catch

2.1. Latest reports and limits

Reported catches of Dissostichus spp. are shown in Table 1. In this fishery, the catch of D. mawsoni reached a maximum of 216 tonnes in 2008. In 2022, 0 tonnes of D. eleginoides and 104 tonnes of D. mawsoni were caught.

The catches reported in Division 58.4.2 include catch data from particular vessels that CCAMLR has agreed should be quarantined as there is no confidence in the amount and/or the location of those catches (SC-CAMLR-XXXIII, paragraph 3.68). All ancillary data associated with these vessels (e.g. by catch, tagging, observer data) is also quarantined and is not included in the data presented in this report.


Table 1. Catch (tonnes) and effort history for Dissostichus spp. in this fishery. Source: Fine scale data and past estimates for IUU catch (-: no fishing, or no IUU estimate available; q: catch data currently quarantined).
Season Number of vessels Catch limit (tonnes) D. eleginoides D. mawsoni Estimated IUU catch (tonnes)
2003 1 0 112
2004 1 500 0 20 197
2005 4 780 1 125 86
2006 3 780 0 164 192
2007 3 780 0 124 288
2008 3 780 0 216 0
2009 2 70 0 19 (q: 47) 176
2010 1 70 0 0 (q: 93) 432
2011 1 70 0 0 (q: 136)
2012 2 70 0 53
2013 1 70 0 4
2014 35
2015 1 35 0 10
2016 35
2017 2 35 0 35
2018 2 42 0 42
2019 2 50 0 50
2020 2 60 0 58
2021 1 60 0 60
2022 2 127 0 104



Table 2: Catch and catch limits by Research Block in 2022 for Dissostichus mawsoni in Division 58.4.2. Source: Fine scale data.
Research Block Catch limit Catch (% of catch limit)
5842_1 72 73 (101.4%)
5842_2 55 30 (54.5%)


2.2. By-catch

Catch limits for by-catch species groups (Macrourus spp., skates and rays, and other species) are defined in Conservation Measure 33-03 and provided in Table 3.

The by-catch in Division 58.4.2 consists predominantly of Macrourus spp. (Table 3).


Table 3. Reported catch and catch limits for by-catch species (Macrourus spp., skates and rays, and others) in this fishery (see Conservation Measure 33-03 for details). -: no fishing. Source: fine-scale data.
Macrourus spp.
Skates and rays
Other catch
Season Catch Limit (tonnes) Reported Catch (tonnes) Catch Limit (tonnes) Reported Catch (tonnes) Number Released Catch Limit (tonnes) Reported Catch (tonnes)
2003 12 <1 0 <1
2004 80 <1 50 <1 0 100 <1
2005 124 19 50 3 3 60 2
2006 124 4 50 <1 0 60 <1
2007 124 7 50 <1 0 60 <1
2008 124 12 50 <1 0 60 1
2009 20 <1 q 50 0 0 40 <1 q
2010 20 <1 q 50 <1 7 40 <1 q
2011 20 <1 q 50 0 0 40 <1 q
2012 20 <1 50 0 0 40 <1
2013 20 <1 50 0 0 20 <1
2014 20 50 20
2015 20 <1 50 0 0 20 <1
2016 20 50 20
2017 6 1 2 0 0 6 <1
2018 7 5 2 <1 1 7 <1
2019 8 2 3 <1 2 8 <1
2020 10 2 3 <1 3 10 <1
2021 10 5 3 <1 0 10 <1
2022 20 12 6 <1 104 20 3


2.3. Vulnerable marine ecosystems (VMEs)

All Members are required to submit, within their general new (Conservation Measure 21-01) and exploratory (Conservation Measure 21-02) fisheries notifications requirements, information on the known and anticipated impacts of their gear on vulnerable marine ecosystems (VMEs), including benthic communities and benthos such as seamounts, hydrothermal vents and cold-water corals. All of the VMEs in CCAMLR’s VME Registry are currently afforded protection through specific area closures.

By the end of this fishing season, there were no VMEs and one VME Risk Area designated in Division 58.4.2.


2.4. Incidental mortality of seabirds and marine mammals

There has been no observed incidental mortality of birds reported by vessels in Division 58.4.2 in this fishery.

There has been no observed incidental mortality of mammals reported by vessels in Division 58.4.2 in this fishery.

The requirements of Conservation Measure 25-02, including the ‘Minimisation of the incidental mortality of seabirds in the course of longline fishing or longline fishing research in the Convention Area’ apply to this fishery. There is an exemption to the requirement for night setting by achieving the sink rates described in Conservation Measure 24-02 and subject to a bird by-catch limit.

The risk level for birds in the fishery in Division 58.4.1 is category 2 (average to low) (SC-CAMLR-XXX, Annex 8, paragraph 8.1).


3. Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) fishing

Two illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU)-listed vessels were detected in Division 58.4.2 in 2006 and 2007. One IUU-listed fishing vessel was sighted in 2009 and two IUU-listed vessels were sighted in 2010. IUU fishing activities were not detected again until 2015. However, IUU fishing activities may still have occurred in the region between 2010 and 2014, but may not have been detected. However, since 2011, following the recognition of methodological issues in its assessment, no estimates of the IUU catch of Dissostichus spp. have been provided (SC-CAMLR-XXIX, paragraph 6.5).


4. Data collection

4.1. Data collection requirements

The collection of biological data under Conservation Measure 23-05 as part of the CCAMLR Scheme of International Scientific Observation (SISO) includes representative samples of length, weight, sex and maturity stage, as well as collection of otoliths for age determination of the target and most frequently taken by-catch species.


4.2. Summary of available data

Both the vessel’s crew and observers collect fishing effort, catch, and by-catch information.

Following Conservation Measure 22-07, vessels participating in this fishery must report the occurrence of VME indicator organisms on hauled lines. To do so, the vessel’s crew observe lines in segments (1000-hook sections or 1200m sections, whichever is the shorter) and report the number of VME indicator units (either one litre of those VME indicator organisms that can be placed in a 10-litre container, or one kilogram of those VME indicator organisms that do not fit into a 10-litre container). Depending on the number of VME indicator units landed, vessels must immediately report and potentially cease fishing in the area (termed a Risk Area) until further review of the data is completed (see Conservation Measure 22-07). Based on the portion of the line monitored, observers further identify VME indicator organisms to the lowest taxonomic level possible.

The vessel’s crew report total catch of non-VME by-catch (mostly fishes) by coarse taxonomic groups given the taxonomic expertise required to discriminate similar species. Observers collect biological information on toothfish and by-catch specimens at a finer taxonomic resolution, as well as data on individual specimens such as size and maturity.

Summaries of data reported to CCAMLR for the past five years are given in Tables 4 and 5.

Table 4. Summary of VME indicator taxa by-catch, by-catch of other species and biological data reported by vessels crew and observers in each of the last five seasons. By-catch records correspond to the number of observations of total weight and count of individuals for each taxon identified. Observers may take further biological measurements on toothfish and by-catch taxa. Taxonomic identification may occur at different levels.
Data source Data class Variable 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Vessel crew VME line segments 165 241 259 239 418
VME indicator units > 5 and < 10 0 0 0 0 0
VME indicator units > 10 0 0 0 0 1
by-catch taxa identified 23 18 21 7 12
records 221 145 185 147 329
Observer VME line segments 213 150 100 239 220
taxa identified 11 11 5 5 15
weight or volume measurements 70 44 9 7 103
toothfish specimens examined 1297 1622 1611 2044 3719
length measurements 1297 1620 1611 2016 3713
weight measurements 1297 1478 1384 1718 3262
sex identifications 1297 1622 1611 2044 3719
maturity stage identifications 276 1431 1388 1735 3340
gonad weight measurements 1007 0 0 0 1
otolith samples 1053 428 600 473 1170
by-catch specimens examined 1944 1645 1519 2116 1994
taxa identified 12 15 8 8 16
length measurements 1921 1565 1512 2112 1986
weight measurements** 1944 1636 1511 2103 1934
standard length measurements* 0 278 568 445 689
wingspan measurements* 1 4 3 4 39
pelvic length measurements* 0 0 0 0 14
snout to anus measurements* 1240 1319 861 1661 1203
sex identifications** 1865 1536 1519 2116 1918
maturity stage identifications** 0 1484 946 2116 1443
gonad weight measurements** 0 0 0 0 0
otolith samples** 169 120 102 85 49
**: Voluntary records
*: Species-dependent records
Table 5. Summary of biological data for predominant by-catch groups reported by observers (from random subsets of lines) in each of the last five seasons. Taxonomic identification may occur at different levels.
By-catch group Variable 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Macrourus spp. specimens examined 1250 1323 902 1666 1203
taxa identified 3 5 3 2 4
length measurements 1229 1244 897 1663 1195
weight measurements** 1250 1316 901 1659 1150
snout to anus measurements* 1240 1319 861 1661 1201
sex identifications** 1220 1253 902 1666 1203
maturity stage identifications** 0 1226 902 1666 1203
gonad weight measurements** 0 0 0 0 0
otolith samples** 167 120 102 85 49
Skates and rays specimens examined 1 4 3 4 40
taxa identified 1 1 1 1 3
length measurements 1 4 3 4 40
weight measurements** 1 4 3 4 39
wingspan measurements* 1 4 3 4 39
pelvic length measurements* 0 0 0 0 14
sex identifications** 1 4 3 4 40
maturity stage identifications** 0 2 2 4 38
gonad weight measurements** 0 0 0 0 0
Other fish specimens examined 691 318 614 446 751
taxa identified 7 9 4 5 9
length measurements 691 317 612 445 751
weight measurements** 691 316 607 440 745
standard length measurements* 0 278 568 445 689
sex identifications** 644 279 614 446 675
maturity stage identifications** 0 256 42 446 202
gonad weight measurements** 0 0 0 0 0
otolith samples** 2 0 0 0 0
**: Voluntary records
*: Species-dependent records


The counts of by-catch taxa reported above (Table 5) correspond to specimens that have been individually sampled by observers. These are a subset of all the specimens counted by observers and are generally identified at a more precise taxonomic level. The figures below (Figs. 2 and 3) display the distribution of the most frequently examined by-catch taxa in time and space. It is important to note that observers sample a random subset of lines and do not individually examine all taxa; as such these figures are more representative of the distribution of biological observations than the catch of these taxa or their spatial distribution. At a coarse taxonomic level, the total catch of by-catch species groups is provided in section 2.2 above.

Figure 2. Relative frequencies of the most commonly examined by-catch taxa in each of the last five seasons, from the observer data (unweighted raw counts of individually examined specimens). Taxonomic identification may occur at different levels.

Figure 2. Relative frequencies of the most commonly examined by-catch taxa in each of the last five seasons, from the observer data (unweighted raw counts of individually examined specimens). Taxonomic identification may occur at different levels.


Figure 3. Spatial distribution of the most commonly examined by-catch taxa across the last five seasons, from the observer data (unweighted raw counts of individually examined specimens in each cell). The data were aggregated using equal area (100 km x 100 km) cells. Taxonomic identification may occur at different levels. Refer to Figure 1 for more details on the boundaries shown.

Figure 3. Spatial distribution of the most commonly examined by-catch taxa across the last five seasons, from the observer data (unweighted raw counts of individually examined specimens in each cell). The data were aggregated using equal area (100 km x 100 km) cells. Taxonomic identification may occur at different levels. Refer to Figure 1 for more details on the boundaries shown.


4.3. Length frequency distributions

The length frequency distributions of D. mawsoni caught in this fishery are shown in Figure 4. These length frequency distributions are unweighted; they have not been adjusted for factors such as the size of the catches from which they were collected. The interannual variability exhibited in the figure may reflect changes in the fished population but is also likely to reflect changes in the gear used, the number of vessels in the fishery and the spatial and temporal distributions of fishing.

The majority of D. mawsoni caught in the Division 58.4.2 fishery ranged from 50 to 175cm in length, with a relatively consistent broad mode at approximately 140cm (Fig. 4). In some years, a distinct bimodal distribution is observed and is likely to be as a result of vessels fishing in shallower water on the shelf.


Figure 4. Annual length frequency distributions of *Dissostichus mawsoni* caught in Division 58.4.2 (top panel) and in each Research Block (lower panels). The number of hauls from which fish were measured (N) and the number of fish measured (n) in each year are indicated. Note: length frequency distributions are only shown where more than 150 fish were measured in a given season.

Figure 4. Annual length frequency distributions of Dissostichus mawsoni caught in Division 58.4.2 (top panel) and in each Research Block (lower panels). The number of hauls from which fish were measured (N) and the number of fish measured (n) in each year are indicated. Note: length frequency distributions are only shown where more than 150 fish were measured in a given season.



4.3. Tagging

Since 2012, vessels have been required to tag and release Dissostichus spp. at a rate of 5 fish per tonne of green weight caught. The tag-overlap statistic estimates the representative similarity between the size distributions of those fish that are tagged by a vessel and of all the fish that are caught by that vessel (Table 6). Each vessel catching more than 10 tonnes of each species of Dissostichus is required to achieve a minimum tag-overlap statistic of 60% (Annex 41-01/C).

Table 6. Annual tagging rate (number of fish tagged per tonne of total catch), reported by vessels operating in this exploratory fishery. The tag-overlap statistics (CM 41-01) for D. mawsoni and D. eleginoides respectively are provided in brackets (NC: Tag-overlap statistic is Not Calculated for less than 30 fish tagged; -: no fish were tagged). In the last row, the tagging rate and tag-overlap statistic were computed using all fish tagged and all fish caught in the area.
Fishing Season
Flag State Vessel name 2012 2013 2015 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Australia Antarctic Aurora 5.2 (83.6,NC)
Australia Antarctic Chieftain 5.1 (77.2,NC) 5.1 (93.1,NC) 5.6 (83.3,NC)
Australia Antarctic Discovery 5.9 (84.7,NC)
France Le Saint Andre 5.2 (88.4,-) 6 (83.2,-) 5.3 (72.9,-) 5.6 (87.4,-) 5.2 (77.8,-)
Japan Shinsei Maru No. 3 5.7 (NC,NC)
Republic of Korea Hong Jin No. 701 5 (77.4,-)
Republic of Korea Kingstar 8.5 (86.3,-) 5.5 (81.8,-)
South Africa Koryo Maru No. 11 5.2 (52.9,NC)
Total 5.1 (78.1,NC) 5.7 (NC,NC) 8.5 (86.3,-) 5.4 (86.6,-) 5.4 (81.7,NC) 5.2 (86.5,NC) 5.6 (89.8,NC) 5.2 (83.6,NC) 5.6 (83.3,NC)


To date in this area, 4596 D. mawsoni have been tagged and released (27 have been recaptured; Table 7), and, 39 D. eleginoides have been tagged and released (0 have been recaptured; Table 8).

Table 7. Number of D. mawsoni tagged in recent fishing Seasons. The number of fish recaptured by each vessel in each Season is provided in brackets.
Fishing Season
Flag State Vessel name 2012 2013 2015 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Australia Antarctic Aurora 309 (10)
Australia Antarctic Chieftain 140 (0) 170 (0) 222 (3)
Australia Antarctic Discovery 375 (4)
France Le Saint Andre 76 (0) 85 (0) 88 (5) 100 (2) 211 (1)
Japan Shinsei Maru No. 3 20 (0)
Republic of Korea Hong Jin No. 701 203 (0)
Republic of Korea Kingstar 82 (0) 110 (0)
South Africa Koryo Maru No. 11 63 (0)
Total 266 (0) 20 (0) 82 (0) 186 (0) 225 (0) 258 (5) 322 (5) 309 (10) 586 (5)


Table 8. Number of D. eleginoides tagged in recent fishing Seasons. The number of fish recaptured by each vessel in each Season is provided in brackets.
Fishing Season
Flag State Vessel name 2012 2013 2015 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Australia Antarctic Aurora 0 (0)
Australia Antarctic Chieftain 1 (0) 0 (0) 1 (0)
Australia Antarctic Discovery 0 (0)
France Le Saint Andre 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Japan Shinsei Maru No. 3 1 (0)
Republic of Korea Hong Jin No. 701 0 (0)
Republic of Korea Kingstar 0 (0) 0 (0)
South Africa Koryo Maru No. 11 3 (0)
Total 3 (0) 1 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (0) 0 (0) 1 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)


5. Research

5.1. Status of the science

Catch limits for CCAMLR’s fisheries for D. mawsoni and D. eleginoides for the ‘assessed’ fisheries are set using fully integrated assessments; more basic approaches are used for the ‘data-poor’ fisheries (in Subarea 48.6 and in Area 58 outside the exclusive economic zones (EEZs)). CCAMLR has developed a framework for designing and undertaking research fishing designed to lead to an assessment of these toothfish stocks in the short to medium term, established under the provisions of Conservation Measure 41-01. This research planning framework has three phases: prospecting phase, biomass estimation phase and assessment development phase, with a set of decisions and review for the progression between stages.

In order to obtain the data necessary for a stock assessment, catch limits for research fishing by commercial vessels are set at a level intended to provide sufficient information (including sufficient recaptures of tagged fish) to achieve a stock assessment within a time period of 3 to 5 years. These catch limits are also set so that they provide reasonable certainty that exploitation rates at the scale of the stock or research unit will not negatively impact the stock. Appropriate exploitation rates are based on estimates from areas with assessed fisheries and are not more than 3-4% of the estimated stock size.

Spanish and Australian scientists are working on the age and growth estimates of Antarctic toothfish within divisions 58.4.1 and 58.4.2 from 2015 and 2017 respectively.

In 2018, an initial stock assessment model was developed for Antarctic toothfish in Divisions 58.4.1 and 58.4.2 (WG-FSA-18/58 rev1) but deemed to be unsuitable to provide management advice on catch limits.

In 2019, Korean scientists joined this collaborative work (WG-FSA-2019/47).

In 2021, WG-FSA-2021/18 presented a report of research activities conducted in this Division since 2012.

In 2022, WG-FSA-2022/10 provided an overview of the deployments of Conductivity, Temperature and Depth (CTD) loggers and Benthic Video Cameras (BVCs) in this fishery which revealed that the majority of fishing activity occurred in waters with unconsolidated soft substrate with very low densities of VME taxa. WG-FSA-2022/21 reported on fish by-catch in this fishery, indicating that by-catch biomass was dominated (98%) by two families: Macrouridae and Channichthyidae, and that Macrourus catch was dominated by females in all research blocks without changes in length frequency distribution patterns over time. WG-FSA-2022/25 examined simulated egg and larval transport under different SAM phases in the continental shelf-slope regions of East Antarctica using particle tracking models, indicating a negative relationship between the relative SAM phase and the predicted percentage of successful transport. WG-FSA-2022/34 presented an updated preliminary integrated stock assessment for this fishery indicating that the Antarctic toothfish stock in Divisions 58.4.1 and 58.4.2 was unlikely to be depleted by the current level of fishing mortality.


5.2. Research plans

5.2.1. Background

Exploratory fishing for toothfish (Dissostichus spp.) in Division 58.4.2 began in 2003. However, a robust stock assessment and catch limits according to CCAMLR decision rules remain to be determined for this Division. Accordingly, the current exploratory Antarctic toothfish (Dissostichus mawsoni) fishery in this Division has been identified as ‘data-poor’. In 2014, a Research Block was designated in this Division. Research plans are generally focused in Research Block, to facilitate the development of local biomass estimates. All Members notifying to fish in Division 58.4.2 submitted a research plan, based on Conservation Measure 24-01, Annex 24-01/A, format 2.

In 2019, Australia, France, Japan, the Republic of Korea and Spain collaborated on a multi-member research plan on the Dissostichus mawsoni exploratory fishery in East Antarctica (Divisions 58.4.1 and 58.4.2) (WG-FSA-2019/44).

In 2021, that research plan was updated with 2022 operating details, a change to the sampling design within existing research blocks, and a proposed new research block WG-SAM-2021/03.

In 2022, that research plan was updated (WG-SAM-2022/04) following a review of its spatial design indicating that Antarctic toothfish across Divisions 58.4.1 and 58.4.2 may be considered as a single stock (WG-SAM-2022/09). The research plan was updated with relevant details for all notified vessels, and random depth-stratified sampling locations in all research blocks.

5.2.2. Objectives

Standard catch, fishing effort, tagging and biological data will be collected under CM 41-05 and 41-11 to inform an assessment of the status and productivity of toothfish in this Division. Annual milestones include updated reports on research activity and collected data, and ageing of collected toothfish otoliths, while the estimation of biological parameters and the stock assessment will be updated biennially. Pop-up satellite tags will be released from Korean and Japanese fishing vessels to investigate toothfish behaviour and movement. The collection of environmental data will continue annually or as opportunities arise. Environmental data collection will entail the attachment of conductivity, temperature and depth loggers (CTD loggers) and Benthic Video Cameras (BVCs) to fishing gear. CTD loggers and BVCs will be deployed from Australian, French and Spanish vessels. By-catch data will be collected in accordance with relevant conservation measures (CMs 33-03, 41-05 and 41-11). These data will help to update estimations of the distribution, relative abundance, and life history of the main by-catch species. In addition, the assessment and recommendations for catch limits of main by-catch species, particularly Macrourus, will be updated and current mitigation measures evaluated. Samples of fish muscle tissue, stomach contents, plankton and zooplankton will be used for the investigation of feeding strategy of Antarctic toothfish based on stomach analysis, and trophic relationships and ecosystem function based on fatty acid and stable isotope sampling.

The 2022 multi-member research plan (WG-SAM-2022/04) aims to achieve four objectives:

Objective 1: Provide an assessment of the status and productivity of toothfish stocks,

Objective 2: Identify the spatial distributions of toothfish, important habitats and vulnerable marine ecosystems (VME) in order to inform spatial management approaches,

Objective 3: Identify the spatial and depth distributions of by-catch species, and inform by-catch mitigation measures,

Objective 4: Improve the understanding of trophic relationships and ecosystem function to assist the development of ecosystem-based fisheries management approaches.


5.3. Advice by the Scientific Committee

In 2016, the Scientific Committee considered the advice of WG-FSA on research in Divisions 58.4.1 and 58.4.2 and agreed that the research plan in WG-FSA-16/29 was appropriate to achieve the research objectives.

In 2017, the Scientific Committee recommended that the catch limits for these divisions remain unchanged for 2018 and supported the catch allocation scheme developed by the research proponents in 2016.

In 2019, the Commission agreed that the research plan was appropriate to achieve the research objectives in 58.4.2, with a catch limit of 50 tonnes in Research Block 5842_1.

In 2021, following the Scientific Committee’s advice (SC-CCAMLR-40, paragraph 3.104), the Commission agreed that this research should proceed in 2022 (CCAMLR-40, paragraph 6.40).

In 2022, following the Scientific Committee’s advice (SC-CCAMLR-41, paragraph 3.136), the Commission agreed that this research should proceed in 2023 (CCAMLR-41, paragraph 4.45).

6. Stock status

6.1. Summary of current status

As a data-limited fishery, this fishery does not have such estimates.


6.2. Assessment method

Stock biomass and catch limits in data-limited fisheries are estimated using the trend analysis.


6.3. Year of last assessment, year of next assessment

Research plans for data-limited fisheries are reviewed annually.


7. Climate Change and environmental variability

In 2018, a summary of the potential impacts of climate change on Southern Ocean fisheries (FAO 2018) highlighted the following key points:

The Antarctic region is characterized by complex interaction of natural climate variability and anthropogenic climate change that produce high levels of variability in both physical and biological systems, including impacts on key fishery taxa such as Antarctic krill. The impact of anthropogenic climate change in the short-term could be expected to be related to changes in sea ice and physical access to fishing grounds, whereas longer-term implications are likely to include changes in ecosystem productivity affecting target stocks. There are no resident human populations or fishery-dependent livelihoods in the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) Area, therefore climate change will have limited direct implications for regional food security. However, as an “under-exploited” fishery, there is potential for krill to play a role in global food security in the longer term. The institutional and management approach taken by CCAMLR, including the ecosystem-based approach, the establishment of large marine protected areas, and scientific monitoring programmes, provides measures of resilience to climate change.

In 2022, the Commission recognised that climate change is already having effects in the Convention Area (CCAMLR-41, paragraph 6.3) and agreed that it needed to act urgently to prepare for, and adapt to, the effects of climate change on the marine ecosystems within the Convention Area (CCAMLR-41, paragraph 6.5). The Commission noted (CCAMLR-41, paragraph 6.4) that the Scientific Committee had incorporated climate change into its advice (SC-CAMLR-41, paragraph 7.8) and through discussions at the SC-Symposium (SC-CAMLR-41, Annex 11) had also added climate change to the work plans and terms of reference of its Working Groups (SC-CAMLR-41, paragraph 7.14). The Commission also welcomed (CCAMLR-41, paragraph 6.8) the Scientific Committee’s agreement to hold a workshop on climate change in the first half of 2023 (SC-CAMLR-41, paragraph 7.10) and encouraged the inclusion of a range of scientific experts as well as policy makers to foster integration of the best available science into management actions. The Commission adopted (CCAMLR-41, paragraph 6.28) Resolution 36/41.


Additional Resources